2005
DOI: 10.1029/2004jd005312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial leader velocities during intracloud lightning: Possible evidence for a runaway breakdown effect

Abstract: [1] Using three-dimensional lightning mapping observations, the initial leaders of intracloud flashes have been found to start at a median speed of about 1.6 Â 10 5 m s À1 and to decelerate during the first 10-15 ms of the discharge. The results disagree with the predictions that the speed should increase with time as the developing leader shorts out an increasing potential difference in the storm. The observations can be explained if the flash initiation region is preconditioned in some manner to give a high … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
62
3
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(44 reference statements)
8
62
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We simulate the initial stages of the lightning tree development, where it can be assumed that the discharge is predominantly vertical and has a length scale, ℓ 0 , between tens of meters up to ∼2 km. Beyond this length the leader network starts to branch horizontally inside the thunderstorm charge centers [e.g., Rison et al , ; Thomas et al , ; Behnke et al , ]. Winn et al [, Figure 9] used electric field change data recorded at distances of ∼200 m from the lightning channels combined with VHF mapping to estimate leader step lengths of ∼50–600 m. Marshall et al [, Table 2] used an array of fast antennas to estimate vertical displacements in IBP bursts of ∼200–1800 m. For this reason, we assume that ℓ step can vary between tens of meters up to ∼1.5 km.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We simulate the initial stages of the lightning tree development, where it can be assumed that the discharge is predominantly vertical and has a length scale, ℓ 0 , between tens of meters up to ∼2 km. Beyond this length the leader network starts to branch horizontally inside the thunderstorm charge centers [e.g., Rison et al , ; Thomas et al , ; Behnke et al , ]. Winn et al [, Figure 9] used electric field change data recorded at distances of ∼200 m from the lightning channels combined with VHF mapping to estimate leader step lengths of ∼50–600 m. Marshall et al [, Table 2] used an array of fast antennas to estimate vertical displacements in IBP bursts of ∼200–1800 m. For this reason, we assume that ℓ step can vary between tens of meters up to ∼1.5 km.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of Mansell et al [2002] may temporarily put one end of the tree on hold in case any deviation from neutrality arises. The models of Mazur and Ruhnke [1998], Bazelyan and Raizer [2000], Behnke et al [2005], and Riousset et al [2007] shift the potential of the leader such that its net induced charge is zero. The potential of the leader is the average ambient potential over the leader length [Bazelyan and Raizer, 2000].…”
Section: The Effect Of Negative and Positive Leader Speed Difference mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an essential element of the graph, our version uses dashed lines to provide a reference for slopes of leader traces corresponding to different 2-D radial speeds relative to the chosen point (note that Behnke et al [2005] used separate t-x and t-y plots to determine leader speeds). The slope of traces of sources is a proxy for leader propagation velocity, useful for qualitative purposes and rough estimates (which suffices for this study), but we do recognize that it is not the true 3-D leader speed.…”
Section: Der Velde and Montanyà: Asymmetries Of Leaders In Lightningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TGFs have been shown to occur at the beginning of intra-cloud lightning flashes, just after the initiation occurs. For instance, Behnke et al (2005) measured the initial leader velocities during intracloud lightning and Fig. 28 Simulation of a relativistic feedback discharge inside a thundercloud.…”
Section: The Tgf-lightning Connectionmentioning
confidence: 99%