2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial national investigation of the prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart malformations in Japan-Regional Detection Rate and Emergency Transfer from 2013 to 2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In San Diego between 2015 and 2016, prenatal detection rates of critical outflow tract anomalies was 61% [13]. In Japan between 2013 and 2017, 41% of infants with CCHD were diagnosed prenatally [28]. In Sweden between 2013 and 2017, 56% of infants with CCHD were diagnosed prenatally, with the prenatal detection rate for single ventricle lesions being 100% compared to 9% for TGA, an outflow tract anomaly [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In San Diego between 2015 and 2016, prenatal detection rates of critical outflow tract anomalies was 61% [13]. In Japan between 2013 and 2017, 41% of infants with CCHD were diagnosed prenatally [28]. In Sweden between 2013 and 2017, 56% of infants with CCHD were diagnosed prenatally, with the prenatal detection rate for single ventricle lesions being 100% compared to 9% for TGA, an outflow tract anomaly [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the ability to diagnose almost all major CHD in utero with a false-negative rate of less than 5% in tertiary fetal cardiology practice 10 , the current rate of detection at screening ultrasound, even in developed countries, ranges from 30% to 60% [11][12][13][14][15] . Although the ease of detection of CHD subtypes at obstetric anatomic screening ultrasound is likely to be a significant predictor of prenatal diagnosis 16,17 , other factors may also play a role, including socioeconomic status (SES) and remoteness of residence (RoR) from tertiary-care obstetric ultrasound screening programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prenatal detection rates for CHD have increased with improved ultrasound technology, the use of the early fetal echocardiography, and standardization of the performance of the fetal echocardiogram 8–12 . Accurate prenatal detection of CHD, particularly complex CHD, allows for patient autonomy in deciding pregnancy continuation as well as for proper delivery planning, including transfer to appropriate level care center, and coordination of care at time of delivery for conditions requiring an immediate postnatal intervention or evaluation 13–15 . However, some studies have disputed the advantages of an accurate prenatal diagnosis of CHD on improving postnatal outcomes 16 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%