2000
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.135.5.530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Presentation With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
155
4
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
155
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Our frequency of 78% undergoing resection was lower than that in US studies (90 -92%; Ciccolallo et al, 2005) but close to figures for European community practice (Gatta et al, 2000;Pitchforth et al, 2002). The differences may be partly a result of variations in stage distribution between populations, but are more likely to be due to lack of consensus regarding resection of the primary tumour in stage IV patients (Rosen et al, 2000;Sarela et al, 2001;Ruo et al, 2003). In two US population-based studies, 66% of stage IV patients of all ages (Cook et al, 2005) and 72% of those aged X65 had primary cancerdirected surgery (Temple et al, 2004); this was 51% in our study overall.…”
Section: Treatment Rates and Trends Over Timecontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Our frequency of 78% undergoing resection was lower than that in US studies (90 -92%; Ciccolallo et al, 2005) but close to figures for European community practice (Gatta et al, 2000;Pitchforth et al, 2002). The differences may be partly a result of variations in stage distribution between populations, but are more likely to be due to lack of consensus regarding resection of the primary tumour in stage IV patients (Rosen et al, 2000;Sarela et al, 2001;Ruo et al, 2003). In two US population-based studies, 66% of stage IV patients of all ages (Cook et al, 2005) and 72% of those aged X65 had primary cancerdirected surgery (Temple et al, 2004); this was 51% in our study overall.…”
Section: Treatment Rates and Trends Over Timecontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Outcomes in such patients are defined by the extent of hepatic tumor burden (3,11). Although aggressive primary tumor characteristics portend a high risk for distant metastases (10,11), the correlation between primary tumor biology and the extent of intrahepatic metastatic disease requires further clarification.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes in such patients are defined by the extent of hepatic tumor burden (3,11). Although aggressive primary tumor characteristics portend a high risk for distant metastases (10,11), the correlation between primary tumor biology and the extent of intrahepatic metastatic disease requires further clarification. The biologic significance of nodal staging in patients with liver metastases (LM) may become increasingly important as patients with synchronous disease are more likely to obtain control of their liver disease with more effective systemic regimens and potentially immunotherapy (12).…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no doubt that resection or stoma placement is mandatory before starting systemic chemotherapy among patients with severe intestinal symptoms 1, 2, 3. Palliative resection of primary tumors reportedly improves systemic chemotherapy efficacy4 and prolongs time to treatment failure 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%