2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Psychometric Assessment of a Functional Oral Intake Scale for Dysphagia in Stroke Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
979
0
51

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,364 publications
(1,094 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
979
0
51
Order By: Relevance
“…The association analysis between the scales DOSS (7) and FOIS (9) of the different evaluators is described on Tables 2 and 3. It was verified significant association between the scores of the two scales (p < 0.001), in other words, the higher the score in DOSS (7) scale, higher the score at FOIS (9) scale; according to both evaluators' analysis, the higher the dysphagia severity, lower the level of food oral intake.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The association analysis between the scales DOSS (7) and FOIS (9) of the different evaluators is described on Tables 2 and 3. It was verified significant association between the scores of the two scales (p < 0.001), in other words, the higher the score in DOSS (7) scale, higher the score at FOIS (9) scale; according to both evaluators' analysis, the higher the dysphagia severity, lower the level of food oral intake.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the matching between the evaluations of the two evaluators of FOIS (9) To numerically analyze the relation between the scores of the two scales it was calculated the Spearman correlation coefficient, due to the lack of regular distribution of the variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The aim of this study was to perform HRIM with PFA in a heterogeneous group of children with clinically recognised signs of OPD to investigate potential correlations with established clinical assessment scales, namely the Dysphagia Disorders Survey (DDS) (21), and the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) (22). We hypothesised that PFA metrics would differentiate OPD patients from non-OPD controls, and correlate with DDS and FOIS scores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%