1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02745945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial public offerings by mutual thrifts: The regulatory impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the results of Model 1, firm size and insider ownership are both insignificant. This is consistent with greater underpricing for converting thrifts where insiders acquire greater holdings as documented by Maksimovic and Unal (1993) and Cox and Roden (1999). 15 Based on the July 12, 2000 Federal Register, the OTS provided only lax enforcement of their dividend-policy regulation.…”
Section: 16supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the results of Model 1, firm size and insider ownership are both insignificant. This is consistent with greater underpricing for converting thrifts where insiders acquire greater holdings as documented by Maksimovic and Unal (1993) and Cox and Roden (1999). 15 Based on the July 12, 2000 Federal Register, the OTS provided only lax enforcement of their dividend-policy regulation.…”
Section: 16supporting
confidence: 74%
“…The conversion of mutual thrifts to stock companies has led to controversy and concern over the potential transfer of wealth from depositor-owners to new shareholders (Masulis (1987), Kroszner and Strahan (1996), Unal (1997), Cagle and Porter (1997), and Cox and Roden (1999)). We demonstrate and test how dividend policy transfers wealth in a mutual holding company (MHC).…”
Section: Mutual Holding Companies: Evidence Of Conflicts Of Interest mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dunham (1985) finds that insiders purchase 20% of all conversion shares. Cox and Roden (1999) find that inside participation averaged 10% during the period 1988–97.…”
Section: Demutualization Literature and Historymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Barth, Brumbaugh, and Kleidon (1994) report average initial returns of 24% for 1992 and 29% for 1993. Cox and Roden (1999) find average 1‐day adjusted returns of 26.3% for the period 1993 to 1997.…”
Section: Demutualization Literature and Historymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Cox and Roden (1999) provide evidence of deliberate under-pricing in mutual thrift IPOs through their analysis of abnormal returns. Generally, previous studies indicate that the returns from MSB IPOs are high, but not necessarily higher than those from IPOs of other thrifts and commercial banks.…”
Section: (Ii) Mutual Savings Banksmentioning
confidence: 99%