1986
DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(86)90227-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial REM sleep suppression by clomipramine: A prognostic tool for treatment response in patients with a major depressive disorder

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
9
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the clinical response to amitriptyline and clomipramine appears to be related to the degree of REM sleep suppression [81][82][83] in support of Vogel et al [66]. As mentioned above, the response to trimipramine is not related to a decrease in the amount of REM sleep [71][72][73].…”
Section: Tricyclicssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Interestingly, the clinical response to amitriptyline and clomipramine appears to be related to the degree of REM sleep suppression [81][82][83] in support of Vogel et al [66]. As mentioned above, the response to trimipramine is not related to a decrease in the amount of REM sleep [71][72][73].…”
Section: Tricyclicssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Moreover, the sleep effects offluoxetine were similar in both responders and nonresponders. There was no evidence to suggest that clinical response was related to the degree of REM sleep suppression, in contrast to some studies ofTCAs (31)(32)(33). A preliminary study suggests that the alerting effects offluoxetine may also be evident in children and adolescents with depression, although REM sleep measures were largely unaffected by treatment (45).…”
Section: Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitorscontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…A study using REM latency under medication-free condition as a predictor for the response with fluoxetine failed to do so (Heiligenstein et al, 1994). On the other hand, initial response of slow-wave EEG activity (Kupfer et al, 1989) and REM suppression (Höchli et al, 1986) to clomipramine and REM suppression to amitriptyline (Kupfer et al, 1978;Gillin et al, 1978) seems to have a prognostic value for clinical outcome. Comparing the figures of REM density in our study at D7 under the two different drugs, we submit an initial REM density suppression by paroxetine, which is followed by an increase in REM density in the course of the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some antidepressive substances lack a suppressive effect on REM sleep, like trimipramine (Steiger et al, 1989) nefazodone (Vogel et al, 1998) and bupropione (Nofzinger et al, 1995). However, other studies show that early changes of REM sleep parameters, especially REM latency and percentage amount of REM during the sleep period time, might predict treatment outcome with substances, which have an accute effect on REM sleep like amitriptyline (Kupfer et al, 1981;Gillin et al, 1978) and clomipramine (Höchli et al, 1986). Furthermore, changes in REM sleep, especially REM density, occur in the course of antidepressive treatment with fluoxetine (Buysse et al, 1999a) leading to an increase in REM density, whereas under nonpharmacological treatment (Thase et al, 1994;Buysse et al, 1999a) REM density decreases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%