2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0722-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial results for patient setup verification using transperineal ultrasound and cone beam CT in external beam radiation therapy of prostate cancer

Abstract: BackgroundEvaluation of set up error detection by a transperineal ultrasound in comparison with a cone beam CT (CBCT) based system in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of prostate cancer.MethodsSetup verification was performed with transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) and CBCT for 10 patients treated with EBRT for prostate cancer. In total, 150 ultrasound and CBCT scans were acquired in rapid succession and analyzed for setup errors. The deviation between setup errors of the two modalities was evaluated separa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low-dose PTV (margin of 10 mm, 7 mm towards posterior) was covered by the 60 Gy isodose. To ensure precise application, an integrated offline/online protocol of volumetric cone beam CT-guided radiotherapy was strictly implemented at our institution [ 11 , 27 30 ]. Accurate positioning with daily IGRT contributes to improved tumor control and minimizes dose deviations [ 31 33 ], which is especially important for small PTV margins in high-risk disease with possible microscopic extracapsular extension [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low-dose PTV (margin of 10 mm, 7 mm towards posterior) was covered by the 60 Gy isodose. To ensure precise application, an integrated offline/online protocol of volumetric cone beam CT-guided radiotherapy was strictly implemented at our institution [ 11 , 27 30 ]. Accurate positioning with daily IGRT contributes to improved tumor control and minimizes dose deviations [ 31 33 ], which is especially important for small PTV margins in high-risk disease with possible microscopic extracapsular extension [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other US image guidance methods have also been tested in prostate cancer patients, where a range of uncertainties from 1.4 to 7.9 mm (SD) have been reported [6] . A representative example, Richter et al [21] , compared the use of transperitoneal US to CBCT in patient alignment, where lateral, vertical and longitudinal uncertainties were measured to be 2.3, 2.4 and 2.7 mm (SD), respectively, with a mean Euclidean error of 3.1 mm (SD) and an overall mean discrepancy of 6 mm. In this study, the US-based platform was able to align the bladder (target) within the phantom independent of the surrounding skeletal structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study [ 21 ] also compared the results of a surface imaging system (AlignRT, VisionRT, London, UK) with TAUS imaging. The four most recent studies [ 22 25 ] examined the use of TPUS imaging in comparison with volumetric imaging only, such as CBCT and an additionally acquired planning CT.…”
Section: Interfraction Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%