2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial rupture processes of the 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan, China earthquake: From near-source seismic records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, how precise the seismic relocation results are for the earthquakes that occurred in the transition zone between orogenic belt and sedimentary basin is a subject of debate, mainly because the relocation algorithms cannot fully incorporate the effects of the subcrustal material heterogeneities and structural complexities. For example, even 12 years after the 2008 M W 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake, we still do not know the exact position of the hypocenter: the inferred depths vary considerably (8.4-19 km) (Gong et al, 2019). More specifically, initial rupture was found at S15 km depth based on a high-angle listric-reverse fault model of the Longmenshan fault system (Zhang et al, 2009, Zhang et al, 2012, whereas a much shallower depth of &10 km was also proposed based on a steep reverse fault model (Xu et al, 2009;Hubbard and Shaw, 2009;Gong et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, how precise the seismic relocation results are for the earthquakes that occurred in the transition zone between orogenic belt and sedimentary basin is a subject of debate, mainly because the relocation algorithms cannot fully incorporate the effects of the subcrustal material heterogeneities and structural complexities. For example, even 12 years after the 2008 M W 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake, we still do not know the exact position of the hypocenter: the inferred depths vary considerably (8.4-19 km) (Gong et al, 2019). More specifically, initial rupture was found at S15 km depth based on a high-angle listric-reverse fault model of the Longmenshan fault system (Zhang et al, 2009, Zhang et al, 2012, whereas a much shallower depth of &10 km was also proposed based on a steep reverse fault model (Xu et al, 2009;Hubbard and Shaw, 2009;Gong et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, even 12 years after the 2008 M W 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake, we still do not know the exact position of the hypocenter: the inferred depths vary considerably (8.4-19 km) (Gong et al, 2019). More specifically, initial rupture was found at S15 km depth based on a high-angle listric-reverse fault model of the Longmenshan fault system (Zhang et al, 2009, Zhang et al, 2012, whereas a much shallower depth of &10 km was also proposed based on a steep reverse fault model (Xu et al, 2009;Hubbard and Shaw, 2009;Gong et al, 2019). Usually, strong motion data (Zhang et al, 2012) and geodetic measurements (Shen et al, 2009;Feng et al, 2010) are used to get a precise estimate of the earthquake locations and to infer seismogenic structure, but the results are still biased because the models still miss enough details of the material and structural complexities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field investigations (Xu et al, ) and deep drilling works (Li et al, ; Xue et al, ) try to investigate this earthquake by local observations. Based on previous studies, the general skeleton of the Wenchuan earthquake can be drawn, that the great earthquake occurred on a fault system with a complex geometry (Figure ), had a moment magnitude of Mw 7.9, and initialized at a depth of approximately 19 km (Zhang et al, ), although some debates may remain (Gong et al, ). Generally, the fault system consists of three main obvious rupture faults: the Beichuan Fault, Pengguan Fault, and Xiaoyudong Fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%