2005
DOI: 10.2172/890193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial SB4 Melt Rate Furnace Testing (U)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SMRF runs were recorded in notebook WSRC-NB-2004-00123 and performed per Run Plan SRNL-PSE-2007-00114. 10 However, a shift in the melt rate of the standard used does not allow comparison with these results and the previous SB3/Frit 418 MRF result. The frits that indicated a possible positive impact on SB4 melt rate were Frits 510 and 511.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The SMRF runs were recorded in notebook WSRC-NB-2004-00123 and performed per Run Plan SRNL-PSE-2007-00114. 10 However, a shift in the melt rate of the standard used does not allow comparison with these results and the previous SB3/Frit 418 MRF result. The frits that indicated a possible positive impact on SB4 melt rate were Frits 510 and 511.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…4 This finding was equally important since initial SB4 melt rate testing had little success in finding a frit that would provide melt rate that was considered acceptable for DWPF processing. 5,6 However, shortly after SRNL recommended the use of Frit 503, whoich appeared to have a throughput equivalent to that seen for the Sludge Batch 3 (SB3)-Frit 418 system 4 , the LWO had to change the final composition of SB4. A confirmation sample of SB4 taken from Tank 51 near the end of sludge preparation indicated rheological properties that exceeded the transfer pump criteria.…”
Section: Glass Formulation and Melt Rate Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%