2008
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2008)134:7(960)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Shear Modulus of Remolded Sand-Clay Mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yamada et al [22] also recommend n = 0.5 for granular soils and suggested that n = 1 for plastic clay-sand mixtures (they did not include a void ratio term in their formulation, which may explain why n is higher). All of these forms result in zero shear modulus when the effective stress is zero, which is unrealistic as it does not account for cementation, cohesion, capillary effects, and can be numerically problematic near the surface.…”
Section: Vertical Variation Of Soil Shear Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yamada et al [22] also recommend n = 0.5 for granular soils and suggested that n = 1 for plastic clay-sand mixtures (they did not include a void ratio term in their formulation, which may explain why n is higher). All of these forms result in zero shear modulus when the effective stress is zero, which is unrealistic as it does not account for cementation, cohesion, capillary effects, and can be numerically problematic near the surface.…”
Section: Vertical Variation Of Soil Shear Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n % 1 for clays as proposed by Yamada et al (2008), and m = constant that depends on the clay properties, e.g., plasticity index and structure of the clay; A = a factor that depends on the structure of the clay; P 0 m ¼ mean effective stress. Equation (6) can be expressed in terms of detailed soil parameters as below:…”
Section: Calibration Of Soil Models For Site Response Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) along with the corrected G max of 32 Mpa, A ¼ 288 was computed. Since stiffness degradation of clays is typically insensitive to the variation of effective confining pressure (Kokusho et al 1982;Yamada et al 2008), the modulus-reduction (G/G max ) and damping curve (D) shown in Fig. 2 were applied to all clay layers throughout the model.…”
Section: Calibration Of Soil Models For Site Response Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where 1 for clays as proposed by Yamada et al (2008), and m=constant that depends on the clay properties, e.g., plasticity index and structure of the clay; A=a factor that depends on the structure of the clay; mean effective stress. Eq.…”
Section: Calibration Of Soil Models For Seismic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.4 along with the corrected Gmax of 32 Mpa, 288 was computed. Since stiffness degradation of clays is typically insensitive to the variation of effective confining pressure (Kokusho et al1982;Yamada et al 2008), the large-strain part of the modulus-reduction (G/Gmax) curve shown in Fig. 4.2 is applied to all clay layers throughout the model.…”
Section: Calibration Of Soil Models For Seismic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%