2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.02.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Signs and Symptoms as Prognostic Indicators of Severe Gastrointestinal Tract Injury Due to Corrosive Ingestion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
46
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in a similar study by Chen et al [20] found that there was no statistically significant difference in terms of WBC and CRP values between high-grade and low-grade injuries. In another study in patients with median age 22 years (min:2-max:61), WBC count was higher in high-grade injured patients [21]. Kaya et al and Chen et al reported that WBC count could not predict the severity of esophageal injury in these studies; however Hovanond et al stated that WBC count was an independent predictor for high-grade injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, in a similar study by Chen et al [20] found that there was no statistically significant difference in terms of WBC and CRP values between high-grade and low-grade injuries. In another study in patients with median age 22 years (min:2-max:61), WBC count was higher in high-grade injured patients [21]. Kaya et al and Chen et al reported that WBC count could not predict the severity of esophageal injury in these studies; however Hovanond et al stated that WBC count was an independent predictor for high-grade injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One study suggested that drooling, vomiting, and stridor could be used to predict esophageal injury, while another found that drooling, buccal mucosal burns, and white blood cell count were significant independent predictors of the degree of gastrointestinal injury (13)(14)(15). Other studies, however, could not identify signs or symptoms that could be used to reliably predict degree of injury [16,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing of the EGD is controversial, with some experts recommending performing it emergently while others suggesting waiting 48-72 hours to assess the full extent of the injury [13,14,19]. Endoscopic grading of caustic injuries is based on 4 grades: Grade 1, edema and erythema; Grade 2 (a indicates linear, b indicates circumferential) hemorrhages, erosions, blisters, superficial ulcers, and exudates; Grade 3, multiple deep brownish-black or gray ulcers; Grade 4, perforation [14,19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dans la série Havanond et Havanond [28], l'absence d'hypersalivation, de dysphonie, de défense abdominale et de brûlures oropharyngées était corrélée avec des brûlures caustiques digestives de bas grades.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified