2007
DOI: 10.1029/2007gl031088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial soil moisture retrievals from the METOP‐A Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT)

Abstract: [1] This article presents first results of deriving relative surface soil moisture from the METOP-A Advanced Scatterometer. Retrieval is based on a change detection approach which has originally been developed for the Active Microwave Instrument flown onboard the European satellites ERS-1 and ERS-2. Using model parameters derived from eight years of ERS scatterometer data, first global soil moisture maps have been produced from ASCAT data. The ASCAT data were distributed by EUMETSAT for validation purposes dur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
269
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
269
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, land surface models can produce substantially different drought classifications even when forced with identical meteorological conditions [Mo and Lettenmaier, 2014]. In contrast, the microwave remote sensing of soil moisture not only has global coverage [Bartalis et al, 2007]. Although the sensing depth of satellite data is only a few centimeters, there is generally a close relationship between surface soil moisture and soil moisture in the upper 10 cm [Albergel et al, 2008], which is the depth of the first soil layer for most land surface models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, land surface models can produce substantially different drought classifications even when forced with identical meteorological conditions [Mo and Lettenmaier, 2014]. In contrast, the microwave remote sensing of soil moisture not only has global coverage [Bartalis et al, 2007]. Although the sensing depth of satellite data is only a few centimeters, there is generally a close relationship between surface soil moisture and soil moisture in the upper 10 cm [Albergel et al, 2008], which is the depth of the first soil layer for most land surface models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an important short-term drought indicator, soil moisture can be measured at in situ stations [Robock et al, 2000] or retrieved from satellite remote sensing [Bartalis et al, 2007], and it can also be reconstructed by land surface modeling [Wang et al, 2011]. The in situ measurements have the best estimation at local scale, but they have deficiency in representing the soil moisture dynamics and thus drought at large scale due to insufficient data coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the study period of 2000 to 2006, the CCI-SM data are based on passive microwave observations (i.e. DMSP SSM/I, TRMM TMI, Aqua AMSR-E and Coriolis WindSat; Owe et al, 2008), whereas the active data products are based on observations from the C-band scatterometers on board of the ERS-1 and ERS-2 (Wagner et al, 2013;Bartalis et al, 2007) satellites. In this product, the absolute soil moisture was re-scaled against the 0.25° land surface modeling soil moisture (GLDAS-NOAH, Rodell et al, 2004) using cumulative density function matching.…”
Section: Esa CCI Microwave Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active microwave sensing has also been used to estimate soil moisture. In particular, the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) produces backscatter measurements from transmitted linear frequency-modulated pulses (C-band) to estimate global soil moisture at a 25 km resolution [Bartalis et al, 2007]. The Soil Moisture Active and Passive (SMAP) mission combines active and passive microwave sensing to obtain 9 km resolution global soil moisture, but currently only the passive radiometer is operational [Das et al, 2011, Entekhabi et al, 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%