Thermal growth of silicon oxide films on silicon carbide in O 2 was investigated using oxygen isotopic substitution and narrow resonance nuclear reaction profiling. This investigation was carried out in parallel with the thermal growth of silicon oxide films on Si. Results demonstrate that the limiting steps of the thermal oxide growth are different in these two semiconductors, being diffusion limited in the case of Si and reaction limited in the case of SiC. This fact renders the growth kinetics of SiO 2 on SiC very sensitive to the reactivity of the interface region, whose compositional and structural changes can affect the electrical properties of the structure. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.256102 PACS numbers: 81.65.Mq, 61.82.Fk, 68.35.Fx, 77.55.+f In semiconductor device applications involving high power, frequency, voltage, and/or temperature, Si use is limited by its physical properties. An example is the relative narrow band gap (1.1 eV) that prevents Si devices from operating at high temperatures. The polar crystal silicon carbide (SiC) appears to be the wide band-gap material of choice since besides the wider gap (2.9 eV for the 6H polytype) SiC has other desired properties such as high thermal conductivity, breakdown voltage, and saturated electron drift velocity. It is also the only known compound semiconductor on which SiO 2 can be grown thermally. On the other hand, the properties of the SiO 2 =SiC interface lead to electrical characteristics worse than those of SiO 2 =Si, while the scatter of the available data [1] suggests poor interface control. Investigations of the thermal oxide film on SiC in its different regions have been pursued [2 -7], indicating that in the surface and bulk regions the oxide is similar to that grown on Si [4,8,9], that the interface is less abrupt [5,10], and that incompletely oxidized C or Si are found near the interface [2,3,6,7,[11][12][13][14]. However, a thorough understanding of the phenomena taking place during the thermal growth of SiO 2 on SiC is still missing.Growth of SiO 2 on SiC is much slower than on Si, presenting more scattered data [15][16][17] and differences along the polar directions [ 0001 and (0001) in the hexagonal polytypes]. Several authors have tried to model the kinetics of the thermal growth of SiO 2 on SiC [15,17,18], mostly within the framework of the Deal and Grove model [19], which satisfactorily describes the thermal growth of SiO 2 on Si in dry O 2 for oxide thicknesses above 20 -30 nm. This model is based on a stationary flux of O 2 , the only mobile species, across the growing oxide and on reaction with Si to form SiO 2 only at an abrupt interface. These efforts were curve fittings which did not consider the reaction mechanisms and limiting steps characteristic of the SiO 2 =SiC system. The elucidation of the oxidation mechanismsidentification of the limiting steps and the mobile species and how they are transported during oxide thermal growth-is necessary to develop an oxidation model for SiC allowing prediction and control of the ...