Initial technical basis for late washing filter cleaning

Abstract

This paper was prepared in connectionwith workdone underContract No. DE-AC09-89SR18035 withthe U. S. Departmentof Energy. By acceptanceof this paper, the publisherand/or recipientacknowledgesthe U. S. Government'srightto retain a nonexclusive,royalty-freelicensein and to any copyrightcoveringthis paper, along with the rightto reproduceand to authorizeothersto reproduceali or part of the copyrightedpaper.t .-a/3@ td@7./ DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. l_{eitherthe United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liabfli,'y or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not inf:ringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof."I'hi_report hasbeenrepreduceddirectly/TOm the bestavailable copy.

Crossflow Filtraton: Literature Review

“…The least effective cleaning was performed with M-Pyrol and KOH/Triton recirculation. The best filtrate flux recovery after cleaning was obtained using oxalic acid and caustic recirculation (Morrissey and Dworjanyn, 1992).…”