Initial treatment for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer based on histological type: A 14‐year multicenter study

Abstract

BackgroundTo compare the oncological outcomes of radical chemotherapy (R‐CT), abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery (NACT) for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer, according to histological types: squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC)/adenosquamous cell carcinoma (ASC).MethodsA comparison of 5‐year overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) was performed for the SCC and AC/ASC subgroups for the three initial treatments, assessed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and validated using propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsThe study included 4086 patients: R‐CT, n = 1913; ARH, n = 1529; and NACT, n = 644. AC/ASC had a lower survival rate (63.7%) than SCC (73.6%) and a higher recurrence and mortality rate (36.3% and 26.4%, respectively). The 5‐year OS and DFS rates were different in the SCC group for R‐CT, ARH, and NACT (OS: 69.8% vs. 80.8% vs. 73.0%, p < 0.001; DFS: 66.7% vs. 70.7% vs. 56.4%, p < 0.001), also in the AC/ASC group (OS: 46.1% vs. 70.6% vs. 55.6%, p < 0.001; DFS: 42.7% vs. 64.6% vs. 40.8%, p < 0.001). As for initial treatment, survival outcomes were worse for AC/ASC treated with R‐CT and ARH than for SCC (both p < 0.05), with no group differences between the two treated with NACT.ConclusionInitial treatment influences oncological prognosis for patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer. ARH is an alternative treatment for stage IIIC cervical SCC and AC/ASC, and NACT needs to be chosen with caution, moreover, R‐CT for AC/ASC requires careful selection.