2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.122.090502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initialization of Single Spin Dressed States using Shortcuts to Adiabaticity

Abstract: We demonstrate the use of shortcuts to adiabaticity protocols for initialisation, readout, and coherent control of dressed states generated by closed-contour, coherent driving of a single spin. Such dressed states have recently been shown to exhibit efficient coherence protection, beyond what their two-level counterparts can offer. Our state transfer protocols yield a transfer fidelity of ∼ 99.4(2) % while accelerating the transfer speed by a factor of 2.6 compared to the adiabatic approach. We show bi-directi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenges and prospects of Optimal Control Theory for quantum systems which overlap with those of shortcuts to adiabaticity are discussed in the review articles Glaser et al (2015) and Koch (2016).…”
Section: G Optimal Control and Shortcuts To Adiabaticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The challenges and prospects of Optimal Control Theory for quantum systems which overlap with those of shortcuts to adiabaticity are discussed in the review articles Glaser et al (2015) and Koch (2016).…”
Section: G Optimal Control and Shortcuts To Adiabaticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to which extent the target state is reachable; and control design, possibly including reservoir engineering. A framework to draw the frontiers of controllability is highly desirable for quantum control in open systems (Glaser et al, 2015;Koch, 2016), but note that shortcuts may be applied even if the system is not fully controllable (Petiziol et al, 2018).…”
Section: Outlook Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(21) Comparing against Eqs. (17) and (20), we see that to leading order, non-adiabatic errors do not change the nature of the gate: we still have a pure geometric operation on the qubit subspace and the latter is still decoupled from the auxiliary subspace. Non-adiabatic errors only change the rotation performed on the auxiliary levels.…”
Section: B Non-adiabatic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…STA methods have been used to control a variety of Hamiltonians, such as harmonic-oscillator potentials [23][24][25] and two-level [12,14], three-level [26,27], and four-level [28] systems. They have been utilized experimentally for trapped ions [29], superconducting qubits [30,31], nitrogen-vacancy centers [32,33], ultracold atoms [34], and Bose-Einstein condensates [35]. However there are still many Hamiltonians that are not tractable with standard STA techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%