2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initiating a National Mammographic Screening Program: The Kuwait Experience Training With a US Cancer Center

Abstract: Purpose: To train Kuwait radiologists and technologists in breast imaging to create a Kuwait national mammography screening program (KNMSP) that provides high quality safe mammography services meeting international standards for early detection of small invasive breast cancers in asymptomatic women.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous 2-year report analysis the recall rate was 14.7% with a PPV1 of 8.2% and PPV3 of 37.1%, and the detection rate was 10.7 invasive cancers per 1000 women screened. 6 In our current study the recall rate fluctuated between 11.9% and 16.5% (mean of 14.3%) which is in the same range as the previous study. 6 In addition, the PPV range for a positive mammogram referred for biopsy was 33–55% and of a positive mammogram among all abnormal mammography cases that required additional imaging was 5–12%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our previous 2-year report analysis the recall rate was 14.7% with a PPV1 of 8.2% and PPV3 of 37.1%, and the detection rate was 10.7 invasive cancers per 1000 women screened. 6 In our current study the recall rate fluctuated between 11.9% and 16.5% (mean of 14.3%) which is in the same range as the previous study. 6 In addition, the PPV range for a positive mammogram referred for biopsy was 33–55% and of a positive mammogram among all abnormal mammography cases that required additional imaging was 5–12%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“… 6 In our current study the recall rate fluctuated between 11.9% and 16.5% (mean of 14.3%) which is in the same range as the previous study. 6 In addition, the PPV range for a positive mammogram referred for biopsy was 33–55% and of a positive mammogram among all abnormal mammography cases that required additional imaging was 5–12%. The performance benchmarks for mammography among American Radiologists were lower than our results, including a 9.8% recall, 4.8%, PPV1 and 33.8% PPV3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is located in 17q23.2, which is a region that has been found to be amplified in breast carcinomas and contains several oncogenes [ 21 ]. This miRNA was found up-regulated in ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) compared to non-malignant breast tissues [ 21 ], in several cancers, including BCa [ 17 , 19 , 22 , 23 ] and in the circulation of BCa patients compared to healthy donors [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Moreover, it was found up-regulated in plasma from BCa patients with Her2 and Luminal B subtypes, which proposes a link between hsa-miR-21-5p and the Her2 receptor [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they are more capable of affording mammograms, which detect many malignancies that would otherwise remain undetected till a later stage [19]. High-income countries are more likely to offer population-based mammography screening programs [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] (Figure 3) and have more resources in terms of qualified physicians and mammogram units per capita (Figure 1), which contributes to higher breast cancer incidence through the increased screening. However, high-income countries such as Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, and Saudi Arabia have much lower incidence rates as compared to low-and lowmiddle-income countries (LMICs) such as Jordan, Syrian Arab Republic, Lebanon, Iraq, and Gaza Strip and West Bank.…”
Section: Affluence and Breast Cancer Incidencementioning
confidence: 99%