2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11631-016-0110-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initiation and evolution of the South China Sea: an overview

Abstract: Different models have been proposed for the formation and tectonic evolution of the South China Sea (SCS), including extrusion of the Indochina Peninsula, backarc extension, two-stage opening, proto-SCS dragging, extension induced by a mantle plume, and integrated models that combine diverse factors. Among these, the extrusion model has gained the most attention. Based on simplified physical experiments, this model proposes that collision between the Indian and Eurasian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems sea. Although the opening dynamics of the South China Sea is still unclear (Briais et al, 1993;Flower et al, 1998;Hall, 1996;Hilde et al, 1977;Holloway, 1982;Morley, 2002;Sun et al, 2006Sun et al, , 2016Tapponnier et al, 1990;Taylor & Hayes, 1983;Yao, 1997;Zhang et al, 2018;Zhou et al, 2002), we considered that the SCS could be a marginal sea of back-arc origin based on geochemical evidence from ETO basalt. The first is that the mélange represents a subduction complex that developed in the former Manila Trench during subduction of South China Sea oceanic lithosphere before arc-continent collision (Biq, 1971;Chai, 1972;Ho, 1977;Hsu, 1988;Karig, 1973).…”
Section: 1029/2018gc007902mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems sea. Although the opening dynamics of the South China Sea is still unclear (Briais et al, 1993;Flower et al, 1998;Hall, 1996;Hilde et al, 1977;Holloway, 1982;Morley, 2002;Sun et al, 2006Sun et al, , 2016Tapponnier et al, 1990;Taylor & Hayes, 1983;Yao, 1997;Zhang et al, 2018;Zhou et al, 2002), we considered that the SCS could be a marginal sea of back-arc origin based on geochemical evidence from ETO basalt. The first is that the mélange represents a subduction complex that developed in the former Manila Trench during subduction of South China Sea oceanic lithosphere before arc-continent collision (Biq, 1971;Chai, 1972;Ho, 1977;Hsu, 1988;Karig, 1973).…”
Section: 1029/2018gc007902mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The South China Sea is considered to have been formed by seafloor spreading after rifting of the Euro‐Asia continent between 33 and 15.5 Ma (e.g., Briais et al, ; Li et al, ). The opening dynamics of the South China Sea remain debated (Briais et al, ; Flower et al, ; Hilde et al, ; Holloway, ; Karig, ; Sun, ; Tapponnier et al, ; Taylor & Hayes, ; Zhang et al, ). Basalt formed by the seafloor spreading bears important information on the mantle melting dynamics during the opening of the South China Sea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the Neo-Tethys on the South China Block has received much less attention (Sun 2016) because its current trench is located to the south of the South China Sea, which is far away from the present position of the South China Block (Fig. 12).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Neo-Tethys Plate started to subduct northward at *125 Ma (Sun 2016). With normal plate subduction of the Neo-Tethys, however, it is difficult to not only reach Shilu but to get partial melting as well because it was still several hundred kilometers away from Shilu and would have been cold.…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation