2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initiation and propagation of complex 3D networks of cracks in heterogeneous quasi-brittle materials: Direct comparison between in situ testing-microCT experiments and phase field simulations

Abstract: Keywords:Micro cracking Quasi-brittle Heterogeneous material Phase-field method Gradient damage model Voxel-based models In situ testing X-ray microtomography Digital volume correlation a b s t r a c tWe provide the first direct comparisons, to our knowledge, of complex 3D micro cracking initiation and propagation in heterogeneous quasi-brittle materials modelled by the phase field numerical method and observed in X-ray microtomography images recorded during in situ mechanical testing. Some material parameters… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a noteworthy morphology of the crack network is shown in Figure , where three crack surfaces are observed to propagate separated by approximate angles of 120°, from the bottom of a spherical pore (EPS bead), which is located just above another spherical pore. This typical cracking morphology has already been observed in lightweight plaster under compression and captured by numerical simulation in Nguyen et al…”
Section: Qualitative Characterisation Of Microcracking In Lightweightsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, a noteworthy morphology of the crack network is shown in Figure , where three crack surfaces are observed to propagate separated by approximate angles of 120°, from the bottom of a spherical pore (EPS bead), which is located just above another spherical pore. This typical cracking morphology has already been observed in lightweight plaster under compression and captured by numerical simulation in Nguyen et al…”
Section: Qualitative Characterisation Of Microcracking In Lightweightsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This corresponds to the limit case addressed in Section 3.2.3, where the grey‐level variation generated by the cracks is similar to the image noise. To unambiguously follow qualitatively the damage evolution during the compression test and compare it to the microstructure of the material, an alternative technique could be used as in Nguyen et al It consists in only transforming the deformed images back to the reference frame, without performing the subtraction. The so‐called transformed image would be defined as t ( X ) = g ( ϕ 1 ( X )).…”
Section: Qualitative Characterisation Of Microcracking In Lightweightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phase field simulations were validated against experiments through the comparison of crack patterns in lightweight concrete and plaster [166].…”
Section: Identification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with numerical models using idealised microscale morphologies [14][15][16] or assumed stochastically random field properties [17], the image-based models faithfully reproduce the intrinsic heterogeneity of the material, such as shape, size, and distribution of inclusions and pores [18]. Moreover, the simulated results at different loading steps can be quantitatively validated by in situ experimental images (e.g., XCT) [9,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%