2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injectable network biomaterials via molecular or colloidal self-assembly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 328 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One feature that arises from the design of supramolecular hydrogels is that the dynamic and reversible physical cross‐linking afforded by host–guest recognition leads to materials wherein cross‐links can rupture and reform with no loss of mechanical properties. This feature lends itself to obvious application in preparing injectable materials . Such properties are often characterized using step‐strain rheology experiments, with a high strain (e.g., 200–500%) mimicking the case where pressure is applied to a formed hydrogel in the course of extrusion through a needle.…”
Section: Key Properties Of Host–guest Supramolecular Hydrogels In Biomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One feature that arises from the design of supramolecular hydrogels is that the dynamic and reversible physical cross‐linking afforded by host–guest recognition leads to materials wherein cross‐links can rupture and reform with no loss of mechanical properties. This feature lends itself to obvious application in preparing injectable materials . Such properties are often characterized using step‐strain rheology experiments, with a high strain (e.g., 200–500%) mimicking the case where pressure is applied to a formed hydrogel in the course of extrusion through a needle.…”
Section: Key Properties Of Host–guest Supramolecular Hydrogels In Biomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of molecular recognition or dynamic covalent bonds results in polymer architectures that are often similar to that produced by traditional covalent chemical cross‐linking, with the exception that these interactions break and reform on experimentally relevant timescales, allowing the materials to evolve over time or heal in response to mechanical perturbations. There are many demonstrated applications for the use of supramolecular hydrogels as biomaterials for drug delivery, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noncovalent polymeric hydrogels are built up by reversible non‐covalent interactions that are often constantly in a dynamic state of breaking and reforming or in a poised state for breaking once the correct stimuli is applied . Therefore, they exhibit several interesting macroscale properties as presented in Figure .…”
Section: Key Features Of Noncovalent Polymeric Hydrogelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional permanently hydrogels with extensively high crosslinking density are typically more elastic rather than viscoelastic, and cannot adapt the local environmental complexity of bone defects, i.e., to accommodate the irregular structure and topography of the defects, to replicate the mechanical signals of normal ECM, and to withstand the external forces resulting from regular physiological activities . To overcome these limitations, hydrogels with local adaptability and long‐term bulk stability have emerged as attractive biomaterials, which are typically formed by reversible interactions (e.g., electrostatic interactions, hydrophilic/hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonds, guest–host interactions) . As the term “adaptability” interpreted as the ability to withstand the complex mechanical environment and irregular shape, these adaptable hydrogels have shown desired viscoelasticity including shear‐thinning and self‐healing behavior resulting from the reversibility of physical linkage within the network .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the term “adaptability” interpreted as the ability to withstand the complex mechanical environment and irregular shape, these adaptable hydrogels have shown desired viscoelasticity including shear‐thinning and self‐healing behavior resulting from the reversibility of physical linkage within the network . However, these adaptable hydrogels have shown rather poor mechanical strength due to intrinsic feature of weak reversible bonds, thus restricting their widespread applications as biomaterials to spatially fill the bone defect rather than to substitute the defective load‐bearing bones . Therefore, it still remains a challenge to develop hydrogel biomaterials that are adaptable to the local structural and mechanical environment of bone defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%