requires rapid prototyping, iteration, and optimization of MF devices, the cost and the time of their fabrication are important considerations for the outcome of this work. [16] In addition, MF devices with complex designs are often required for achieving sufficient mixing of the ingredients or for generating spatially heterogeneous (patterned) materials. Another requirement is the device stability and integrity during its operation: it should withstand pressure, wear, and exposure to solvents and reagents without feature distortion, cracking, or delamination, particularly important when many-hour MF device operation is expected.Over the past decades, MF devices have been fabricated in silicon, glass, metals, and polymers. [17][18][19] Currently, soft lithography is the main fabrication method of MF devices in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). This method offers high fidelity and resolution down to the sub-micrometer size range, however PDMS swells in many organic solvents, absorbs amino-containing reagents, delaminates under high pressures, and has high gas permeability. [19][20][21][22] Injection molding and hot embossing microfabrication offer the capability of high-volume device production from chemically resistant polymers, [23] however high cost of molds or stamps and the challenge in the fabrication of devices with complex designs limit the applications of these techniques. Fabrication in silicon provides high thermal conductivity of MF devices, however this method is expensive and labor-and time-consuming. Similarly, fabrication of MF devices in glass is cost-intensive and utilizes hazardous agents such as hydrofluoric acid. [17] Recently, 3D printing has offered a cost-, time-, and laborefficient method for one-step fabrication of 3D objects with complex designs. [19,[24][25][26] This method provides the capability to fabricate MF devices with features that are impossible or challenging to implement by other fabrication techniques, as well as the ability of rapid device prototyping. [27] Prior to the fabrication, the desired device design is implemented in a CAD file, which is then transferred to the printer. The device is then printed in a layer-by-layer fashion. [26] Microfluidic mixers, [28,29] microreactors, [30] and droplet generators [31] have been fabricated in poly(propylene), [30] poly(lactic acid), [32] photocurable resins, [25,28,29] and glass. [33] The utilization of 3D-printed MF devices for materials synthesis and assembly is still in its infancy. [19,26] To the best of our knowledge, 3D-printed MF reactors have been used only the solution-based synthesis of gold and Prussian blue nanoparticles (NPs), [30,34] and their use for extrusion and spraying Microfluidics (MFs) has emerged as a valuable and in some cases, unique platform for the synthesis and assembly of inorganic and polymeric materials. 3D printing enables time-, labor-, and cost-efficient prototyping of MF devices, their durability during operation, and the ability to implement complex designs, however the applications of 3D-printed M...