2000
DOI: 10.1002/pc.10164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injectin molding of short fiber reinforced thermoplastics in a center‐gated mold

Abstract: We have studied injection molding of a rectangular box using short fiber reinforced polypropylene. The fiber orientation distribution and the local stiffness properties in radial and transverse directions have been measured in the bottom plane. The deduced orientation tensors are compared with predictions of a commercial computer code. Discrepancies are related to approximations made in the calculations and effects not accounted for by the present modeling approach. In the calculations the fiber interaction co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 where most of the fibers were seen lying in the LW plane. The ratio of f T :f L :f W is consistent with the injection molded samples reported in the literature [22,23].…”
Section: Fiber Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…7 where most of the fibers were seen lying in the LW plane. The ratio of f T :f L :f W is consistent with the injection molded samples reported in the literature [22,23].…”
Section: Fiber Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As shown in Figure 5, it was found that there were two distinct regions with different fiber alignments across the thickness of non-weld-line specimens. This also had been identified by several other studies [10][11][12][13][14] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The results of the first set Comparing the micrographs reveals the difference in the state of fiber orientation between Case I and Case II. The unique feature of this set of experiments is that all the process conditions for the two Cases were the same during the flow of melt in the cavity number 2; such that in contrast to many studies [2][3][4]19] the difference in the state of fiber orientation in these two Cases cannot be attributed to any properties of melt in filling state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%