2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injection drug users' perceptions regarding use of a medically supervised safer injecting facility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
56
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
56
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be that injectors who smoke crack are deterred from using the supervised injection facility, as smoking is not permitted in the facility. This finding supports previous works46 47 suggesting that operational regulations, such as the ban on smoking drugs in the facility, may pose barriers for a range of IDUs and hinder the potential impact of this intervention in reducing public drug use. However, despite the ability of supervised injection facilities to accommodate the needs of more IDUs by addressing operation issues identified in this and other studies, our findings indicate that the lack of supportive housing and subsequent prevalence of homelessness among IDUs remain the key factor perpetuating public drug use.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It may be that injectors who smoke crack are deterred from using the supervised injection facility, as smoking is not permitted in the facility. This finding supports previous works46 47 suggesting that operational regulations, such as the ban on smoking drugs in the facility, may pose barriers for a range of IDUs and hinder the potential impact of this intervention in reducing public drug use. However, despite the ability of supervised injection facilities to accommodate the needs of more IDUs by addressing operation issues identified in this and other studies, our findings indicate that the lack of supportive housing and subsequent prevalence of homelessness among IDUs remain the key factor perpetuating public drug use.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The significance of these barriers is confirmed by a recent quantitative study examining IDU perceptions of Insite (Petrar et al, 2007), which also identified operating hours and wait times as central issues influencing use of the SIF. These findings emphasize that the SIF is operating at capacity, and increased access to supervised injection is needed to meet the demand that exists for the service.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Reduced sightings of injecting and discarded needles/syringes by local residents and businesses were also reported (KPMG, 2010). A number of evaluations of the DCR provision in Vancouver, Canada, also showed positive outcomes, including cleaner injecting practices, reduced injecting in public places, less unsafe syringe disposal and reduced needle sharing (Wood et al, 2004;Petrar et al, 2007). In addition, the facility attracted higher-risk IDUs including public injectors and users at high risk for HIV and overdose .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%