2008
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001824.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low-back pain

Abstract: Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low-back pain (Review)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
357
1
15

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(377 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
357
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…B. im Bereich der Wirbelsäule, sind verschiedenste Injektionsverfahren weitverbreitet [6,10]. Für die meisten interventionellen Verfahren sind nur kurzfristige Wirkungen nachweisbar oder es gibt keine positive, z. T. sogar eine negative wissenschaftliche Evidenzlage [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Psychosoziale Einflussfaktoren auf chronische Schmerzsyndrome sind wissenschaftlich gut evaluiert.…”
Section: Retrospektive Verlaufsstudie Wiederholter Stationärer Behandunclassified
“…B. im Bereich der Wirbelsäule, sind verschiedenste Injektionsverfahren weitverbreitet [6,10]. Für die meisten interventionellen Verfahren sind nur kurzfristige Wirkungen nachweisbar oder es gibt keine positive, z. T. sogar eine negative wissenschaftliche Evidenzlage [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Psychosoziale Einflussfaktoren auf chronische Schmerzsyndrome sind wissenschaftlich gut evaluiert.…”
Section: Retrospektive Verlaufsstudie Wiederholter Stationärer Behandunclassified
“…ESI may benefit people with spinal stenosis, though the success rate tends to be lower and the duration of effect shorter than for herniated disc [18]. ESIs also have been advocated as a treatment of axial LBP; however, the effect size is small and only a small percentage of people will obtain clinically meaningful benefit [19]. Overall, the evidence for short-term relief with interlaminar ESI (ILESI) ranges from weak to moderate, with conflicting evidence for long-term relief.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less evidence is available for caudal ESI, but there exists a general consensus that it is inferior to TFESI. This may be because the higher volumes needed to reach the areas of Freynhagen et al [85] Multicenter study in Germany 7772 pts with chronic LBP painDETECT 37% of patients found to have predominantly neuropathic pain El Sissi et al [86] Prospective, multicenter, epidemiological study 1134 LANSS 55% of patients with chronic back pain were found to have neuropathic pain Beith et al [87] Cross-sectional study 343 with LBP painDETECT 59% reported likely nociceptive pain, 25% had pain with unclear mechanisms, and 16% had possible neuropathic pain Kaki et al [88] Multicenter (117) Staal et al [19] Epidemiology Insufficient evidence to support the use of injection therapy in subacute and chronic low back pain Armon et al [90] Neurology Does not impact function, decrease rate of surgery, or provide pain relief for >3 month Carragee et al [91] Orthopedic surgery Injection procedures for cervical radicular symptoms may be reasonably considered in patients with severe impairments Deyo et al [8] Internal medicine Increases in expenditures for ESI are not accompanied by improvements in patient outcomes Roberts et al [92] Physical medicine Fair evidence supporting TFESIs for treatment of radicular symptoms, good evidence for surgery sparing. TFESI superior to ILESI for radicular pain DePalma et al [48] Physical medicine Moderate evidence supporting use of ILESIs in treating lumbar radicular symptoms.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical evaluation often results in the diagnosis of postoperative facet joint syndrome (pFJS) [7][8][9][10] , which is confirmed by a facet joint injection with anesthetic agents. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Data on the prevalence of a pFJS in postsurgical patients are scarce, as few studies have investigated this problem. 4,10,19,20 The prevalence of pFJS in patients after lumbar intervention is between 8% and 32%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%