Abstract:The object of this study is to evaluate the effects of injecting adult human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs) into rats with severe traumatic brain injury in acute phase and to determine more optimal injection timing between day 1 and day 2 postinjury. The lateral fluid percussion injury model was used. Adult hBMSCs were transplanted into hemisphere to injury sites in the corpus callosum ipsilateral on day 1 (n = 12) or day 7 (n = 8) after injury. A control group (n = 7) underwent only a sham operation witho… Show more
“…Thirty-eight studies met inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction and quality assessment. Of these studies, some reported more than one pertinent outcome measure so that a total of 10 studies presented data for RR outcomes (16–25), 14 presented data on LV outcomes (23, 26–38), 21 assessed NSS outcomes (17–21, 23–26, 28, 29, 31, 36, 38–53), and 13 presented data on MWM testing (17, 18, 24, 26, 28, 29, 36, 38, 49–53). Specific study characteristics are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few, if any, chronic diseases in medicine that are treated with a single dose of medication. Though four included papers in our analysis looked at multiple doses (16, 23, 31, 52), this is not currently standard in the pre-clinical or the clinical literature. Future directions may include multiple doses for a greater and longer-lasting effect.…”
Background:
No treatment is available to reverse injury associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Progenitor cell therapies show promise in both pre-clinical and clinical studies. We conducted a meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies using progenitor cells to treat TBI.
Methods:
EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Review, Biosis, and Google Scholar were searched for articles using pre-specified search strategies. Studies meeting inclusion criteria underwent data extraction. Analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 according to a fixed-effects model, and all studies underwent quality scoring.
Results:
Of 430 abstracts identified, 38 met inclusion criteria and underwent analysis. Average quality score was 4.32 out of 8 possible points. No study achieved a perfect score. Lesion volume (LV) and Neurologic Severity Score (NSS) outcomes favored cell treatment with standard mean difference (SMD) of 0.86 (95%CI 0.64, 1.09) and 1.36 (95%CI 1.11, 1.60) respectively. Rotarod (RR) and Morris Water Maze (MWM) outcomes also favored treatment with improvements in SMD of 0.34 (95%CI 0.02, 0.65) and 0.46 (95%CI 0.17, 74) respectively. While LV and NSS were robust to publication bias assessments, RR and MWM were not. Heterogeneity (I2) ranged from 74% to 85% among the analyses, indicating a high amount of heterogeneity among studies. Precision as a function of quality score showed a statistically significant increase in the size of the confidence interval as quality improved.
Conclusions:
Our meta-analysis study reveals an overall positive effect of progenitor cell therapies on LV and NSS with a trend towards improved motor function and spatial learning in different TBI animal models.
“…Thirty-eight studies met inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction and quality assessment. Of these studies, some reported more than one pertinent outcome measure so that a total of 10 studies presented data for RR outcomes (16–25), 14 presented data on LV outcomes (23, 26–38), 21 assessed NSS outcomes (17–21, 23–26, 28, 29, 31, 36, 38–53), and 13 presented data on MWM testing (17, 18, 24, 26, 28, 29, 36, 38, 49–53). Specific study characteristics are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few, if any, chronic diseases in medicine that are treated with a single dose of medication. Though four included papers in our analysis looked at multiple doses (16, 23, 31, 52), this is not currently standard in the pre-clinical or the clinical literature. Future directions may include multiple doses for a greater and longer-lasting effect.…”
Background:
No treatment is available to reverse injury associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Progenitor cell therapies show promise in both pre-clinical and clinical studies. We conducted a meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies using progenitor cells to treat TBI.
Methods:
EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Review, Biosis, and Google Scholar were searched for articles using pre-specified search strategies. Studies meeting inclusion criteria underwent data extraction. Analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 according to a fixed-effects model, and all studies underwent quality scoring.
Results:
Of 430 abstracts identified, 38 met inclusion criteria and underwent analysis. Average quality score was 4.32 out of 8 possible points. No study achieved a perfect score. Lesion volume (LV) and Neurologic Severity Score (NSS) outcomes favored cell treatment with standard mean difference (SMD) of 0.86 (95%CI 0.64, 1.09) and 1.36 (95%CI 1.11, 1.60) respectively. Rotarod (RR) and Morris Water Maze (MWM) outcomes also favored treatment with improvements in SMD of 0.34 (95%CI 0.02, 0.65) and 0.46 (95%CI 0.17, 74) respectively. While LV and NSS were robust to publication bias assessments, RR and MWM were not. Heterogeneity (I2) ranged from 74% to 85% among the analyses, indicating a high amount of heterogeneity among studies. Precision as a function of quality score showed a statistically significant increase in the size of the confidence interval as quality improved.
Conclusions:
Our meta-analysis study reveals an overall positive effect of progenitor cell therapies on LV and NSS with a trend towards improved motor function and spatial learning in different TBI animal models.
“…Our results found that MSC(M) and MSC(M) derived EVs administered in TBI 24 h had better neurobehavioral outcomes than those injected greater than 24 h after TBI induction. Han et al found improvements in histological appearance and functional performance after treatment with human MSC(M) seven days after the injury instead of one day after the injury [ 39 ]. However, in human subjects, according to Tian et al there is an advantage of transplanting MSC(M) after a TBI in the window of efficacy that is most likely to result in the best results [ 90 ].…”
“…[52] Interestingly, stroke and TBI might have different optimal timing patterns. Studies in experimental stroke suggest there is greater functional recovery from mesenschymal stem cell and NSC transplantation at 24 hours compared to 7 days after stroke[53,54], with opposite results in experimental TBI[55]. …”
Section: From Preclinical Research To Translationmentioning
Purpose of review
The central nervous system has limited capacity for regeneration after acute and chronic injury. An attractive approach to stimulate neural plasticity in the brain is to transplant stem cells in order to restore function. Here we discuss potential mechanisms of action, current knowledge and future perspectives of clinical stem cell research for stroke and traumatic brain injury.
Recent findings
Preclinical data using various models suggest stem cell therapy to be a promising therapeutic avenue. Progress has been made in elucidating the mechanism of action of various cell types used, shifting the hypothesis from neural replacement to enhancing endogenous repair processes. Translation of these findings in clinical trials is currently being pursued with emphasis on both safety as well as efficacy.
Summary
Clinical trials are currently recruiting patients in phase I and II trials to gain more insight in the therapeutic potential of stem cells in acute cerebral injury. A close interplay between results of these clinical trials and more extensive basic research is essential for future trial design: Choosing the optimal transplantation strategy and selecting the right patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.