1978
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.6154.1759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injuries in Rugby Union football.

Abstract: Summary and conclusionsIn a prospective study of 185 players attached to 10 British rugby clubs, 151 injuries were recorded among 98 of them (53%) during a single season. Forwards sustained significantly more injuries than backs. The standard of rugby, players' body weights, degree of fitness, and presence of joint hypermobility did not affect the risk of injury. The leg was the most common site of injury. Head and neck injuries were significantly more common when play was static and on wet pitches.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Injuries to the head and neck have *Present address: Bridge End 1 Main Street Thurlaston Rugby CV23 9JS been relatively commoner in the last four seasons than in the previous thirty. This agrees with other recent series (Weightman and Browne, 1974; Davies and Gibson, 1978;Davidson, 1978). Few injuries have been serious, with over 80% of the players returning to the game within two weeks.…”
Section: Comments On the Injuriessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Injuries to the head and neck have *Present address: Bridge End 1 Main Street Thurlaston Rugby CV23 9JS been relatively commoner in the last four seasons than in the previous thirty. This agrees with other recent series (Weightman and Browne, 1974; Davies and Gibson, 1978;Davidson, 1978). Few injuries have been serious, with over 80% of the players returning to the game within two weeks.…”
Section: Comments On the Injuriessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Dramatic changes in injury patterns can occur with variations in the training programme or with the development of newer competition techniques (Stallard, 1980;Sperryn, 1976). There have been many reviews of single sports, such as Rowing (Stallard, 1980), Rugby Union (Weightman and Browne, 1974;Davies and Gibson, 1978), Tennis (Carroll, 1981), Badminton (Hensley and Paup, 1979), Football (Bass, 1967) and other ball games (Mathur et al, 1981). Different groups of players have also been studied, including High School (Robey et al, 1971), adolescent (Orava and Puranen, 1978) and female athletes (Orava et al, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Five studies 31,32,37,38,50 adopted a fully-inclusive time-loss definition, 19 five studies 28,30,39,42,48 adopted a semi-inclusive time-loss definition 19 and eight studies 26,29,33,35,40,41,44,53 adopted an all inclusive (both time-loss and medical attention) definition. Other less conventional definitions were adopted by four studies, 27,43,51,56 while 11 studies [21][22][23]25,34,[45][46][47]49,52,55 failed to define injury in the report. Examples of less conventional definitions of sports injury include: the presence of pain, discomfort or disability; any physical complaint; physical damage; and temporary stoppage of the game or the substitution of a player.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this review several studies 21,22,25,[33][34][35]41,43,45,46,49,50,53,55 present combined match/game and training data into the incidence data. This method as described by Brooks and Fuller 19 can be misleading because the data depend on the ratio of match and training exposure as well as the ratio of match and training injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%