2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injuries to elite male cricketers in Australia over a 10-year period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
149
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
149
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, fast bowlers have injury prevalence of approximately 15% (Orchard et al 2006), rates similar to those reported for contact sports such as Australian Rules football (Orchard et al, 2002) and Rugby Union (Brooks et al, 2005). The most prevalent injury among fast bowlers is non-dominant side lumbar stress fracture (Orchard et al, 2006). High peak ground reaction forces during the front foot contact phase of the fast bowling action are believed to be a major contributor to these lower back injuries (Bartlett et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, fast bowlers have injury prevalence of approximately 15% (Orchard et al 2006), rates similar to those reported for contact sports such as Australian Rules football (Orchard et al, 2002) and Rugby Union (Brooks et al, 2005). The most prevalent injury among fast bowlers is non-dominant side lumbar stress fracture (Orchard et al, 2006). High peak ground reaction forces during the front foot contact phase of the fast bowling action are believed to be a major contributor to these lower back injuries (Bartlett et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Cricket is generally considered to be a relatively low-injury sport, with only around five percent of elite players being unavailable to play due to injury at any given time (Orchard et al, 2006;Mansingh et al, 2006;Stretch, 2003;Newman, 2003). However, fast bowlers have injury prevalence of approximately 15% (Orchard et al 2006), rates similar to those reported for contact sports such as Australian Rules football (Orchard et al, 2002) and Rugby Union (Brooks et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for this survey have been described previously. [14] The methods used for Cricket Australia injury surveillance are non-interventional, conform to the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and have been approved by the Cricket Australia Sports Science Sports Medicine Advisory Group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the effect of previous injury on subsequent injury is well established across a number of sports. [1,2] Secondly, workload and workload variation have been identified as major risk factors for fast bowling injury. Both high and low overall bowling workloads have been identified as an injury risk factor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Professional cricket is generally considered a moderate risk sport with overall injury prevalence of approximately 10%, however one particular player type, fast bowlers, have injury prevalence exceeding 18%, a rate comparable to contact sports such as Rugby Union and Australian Football (Orchard et al, 2010). Fast bowler lumbar stress fracture is the single diagnosis that results in the most lost playing time (Orchard et al, 2006). These injuries occur predominantly on the opposite (non-dominant) side to the bowling arm (Gregory et al, 2004;Ranson et al, 2005;Ranson et al, 2010) with the highest ground reaction forces in cricket fast bowling occurring during front foot contact (Hurrion et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%