2011
DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2010.545129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injury rates and risk-factors associated with eventing: a total cohort study of injury events among adult Swedish eventing athletes

Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine injury events and risk-factors among Swedish adult eventing athletes. A cross-sectional study design with retrospective recording of 1-year sports-specific exposure and injury data was used. The invited study population consisted of all members of the Swedish Equestrian Federation with eventing as their primary discipline (n = 513). The participation rate was 70.0%. The total 1-year injury prevalence was 26.6%; the specific 1-year prevalence of traumatic injury was 19.3% an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This area has not previously been investigated in relation to return to sports. Risk‐taking behavior has previously been shown to be associated with an increased injury risk (Junge, ; Ekberg et al., ). In the current study, the ACL‐RSI was significantly correlated (although weakly) to the risk behavior question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This area has not previously been investigated in relation to return to sports. Risk‐taking behavior has previously been shown to be associated with an increased injury risk (Junge, ; Ekberg et al., ). In the current study, the ACL‐RSI was significantly correlated (although weakly) to the risk behavior question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence rate that we have calculated reflects the fact that our study includes all accidents. When investigating racing sports for instance eventing figures are much higher [[19]].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivation to return to the previous activity level and to the sport was assessed using three questions modified from Gobbi and Francisco (2006) that were graded using a scale ranging from 1 (low motivation) to 10 (high motivation) (Ardern et al, 2015). Participants were asked to rank the reasons for playing football before the ACLR by importance (Ekberg et al, 2011). There was also a question about risk behavior during football before the ACLR with responses on a 4-response scale (Table 3) (Ekberg et al, 2011;Kvist et al, 2013).…”
Section: Study Samplementioning
confidence: 99%