2018
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2017.2779440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inkjet-Printed Wideband Circularly Polarized Microstrip Patch Array Antenna on a PET Film Flexible Substrate Material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 1, our design yields a significantly smaller size, a simpler configuration, and a comparable global bandwidth (the global bandwidth is overlapped bandwidths for |S 11 | < −10 dB, CP radiation, and 3-dB gain) relative to the arrays in [11,12]. In comparison with the array using single-feed CP elements [13,14], the proposed antenna achieves a significantly wider global bandwidth, nevertheless a similar complexity. λ is a free space wavelength referring to the center frequency…”
Section: Fabrication and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Table 1, our design yields a significantly smaller size, a simpler configuration, and a comparable global bandwidth (the global bandwidth is overlapped bandwidths for |S 11 | < −10 dB, CP radiation, and 3-dB gain) relative to the arrays in [11,12]. In comparison with the array using single-feed CP elements [13,14], the proposed antenna achieves a significantly wider global bandwidth, nevertheless a similar complexity. λ is a free space wavelength referring to the center frequency…”
Section: Fabrication and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Also, the patches and feeding networks are built on different substrates; they are connected by using vias passed through multi-layers. By using series-parallel strips with curved structures, the feeding networks and patches of the proposed array and the priors in [13,14] are implemented on the top side of a single-layer substrate. As shown in Table 1, our design yields a significantly smaller size, a simpler configuration, and a comparable global bandwidth (the global bandwidth is overlapped bandwidths for |S 11 | < −10 dB, CP radiation, and 3-dB gain) relative to the arrays in [11,12].…”
Section: Fabrication and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations