2014
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201330463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inkjet-printing of hybrid transparent conducting electrodes for organic solar cells

Abstract: Phone: þ85 63 219 5338We developed metal-grid hybrid transparent conducting electrodes (TCEs) by combining a metal grid with a conducting polymer. Metal-grid hybrid TCEs were prepared by inkjetprinting with both PEDOT:PSS and Ag nanoparticle inks and applied to the fabrication of organic solar cells (OSCs) instead of indium tin oxide (ITO). The electrical and optical properties of the metal-grid hybrid TCEs were optimized by modulating the Ag grid's line-to-line spacing (pitch). With a Ag-grid pitch of 1 mm, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FoM of our meshes as well as the corresponding patterning resolution are summarized in Table , along with the comparison data of related mesh electrodes prepared by various solution‐based printing technologies such as inkjet printing, screen printing, and reverse‐offset printing . Through our R‐SLIP method, the resolution of ≈12 µm could be achieved, which is remarkably high as compared to other methods with the resolution of 20–160 µm.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Characteristics Of The Mesh‐patterned Ftcementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The FoM of our meshes as well as the corresponding patterning resolution are summarized in Table , along with the comparison data of related mesh electrodes prepared by various solution‐based printing technologies such as inkjet printing, screen printing, and reverse‐offset printing . Through our R‐SLIP method, the resolution of ≈12 µm could be achieved, which is remarkably high as compared to other methods with the resolution of 20–160 µm.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Characteristics Of The Mesh‐patterned Ftcementioning
confidence: 96%
“…These include UV and nanoimprint lithography, 7,8 rolling mask lithography, 9 hybrid printing, 10 and direct printing. 11−13 All of them have used a regular pattern (e.g., squares 7,11,12 al., 14 where asymmetrical pentagons were developed on a poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several deposition techniques were exploited to fabricate mesh-based TCFs with performance exceeding ITO metrics. These include UV and nanoimprint lithography, , rolling mask lithography, hybrid printing, and direct printing. All of them have used a regular pattern (e.g., squares ,, and hexagons ), except a study by Lordan et al, where asymmetrical pentagons were developed on a poly­(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, exible TCEs have been developed using two main electrical network architectures: 'random networks' and 'regular (periodic) networks'. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Flexible TCEs with random electrical networks are mainly based on irregularly percolated networks of conductive nanomaterials, such as silver nanowires (AgNWs), [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] copper nanowires (CuNWs), [17][18][19] carbon nanotubes (CNTs), [20][21][22][23] and a hybrid of AgNWs and CNTs. 24 In these approaches, the percolated networks were easily prepared by simple solution-based coating methods, including drop-casting, 2-4 ltration, 5,6,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] spraycoating, [7][8...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,31 However, these methods involve a high-vacuum process, such as sputtering or evaporation of metal, which results in complex and expensive fabrication. Non-vacuum methods include jet printing [32][33][34][35][36] and selective laser sintering 37 of metallic ink. Although simple fabrication is achievable, these vacuum-free approaches may suffer from long processing time due to the direct writing nature and difficulty in precision control of the critical dimensions of MGs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%