1981
DOI: 10.2514/3.57584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inlet Drag and Stability Considerations for Mo = 2.00 Design

Abstract: The results of an experimental study to evaluate the performance and low-flow stability limits of several isolated inlet models are presented. The lowest drag approach to provide large-flow regulation was a bypass device for handling the excess airflow. The use of compression surface modulation or a boundary-layer bleed system to dispose of the excess airflow incurred similar drag penalties which were significantly greater than those for the bypass configuration. A good correlation of low-flow stability range … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen, up to now no reliable prediction method of intake buzz has been developed through the analytical investigations. Therefore, numerical [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] or experimental [8,13,23,25,27,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] methods are often used to study the buzz onset as well as its frequency and amplitude for various flow conditions. It seems that the work done by Trapier et al [18] is the most complete study among the numerical investigations because the flow separation is the key phenomenon in the buzz onset according to the Ferri [5] and Dailey [6] criteria, and to the authors' knowledge, this study is the only numerical investigation that uses the large-eddy simulation approach (detached-eddy simulation turbulence model) and three-dimensional grid to study buzz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen, up to now no reliable prediction method of intake buzz has been developed through the analytical investigations. Therefore, numerical [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] or experimental [8,13,23,25,27,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] methods are often used to study the buzz onset as well as its frequency and amplitude for various flow conditions. It seems that the work done by Trapier et al [18] is the most complete study among the numerical investigations because the flow separation is the key phenomenon in the buzz onset according to the Ferri [5] and Dailey [6] criteria, and to the authors' knowledge, this study is the only numerical investigation that uses the large-eddy simulation approach (detached-eddy simulation turbulence model) and three-dimensional grid to study buzz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has favorable effects in extending the stable subcritical range of the intake along with an increase of the bleed drag. 70…”
Section: Effects Of the Bleed On Buzz Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%