2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inline monitoring of basalt-based composites under impact tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Impact tests are carried out with a modified Charpy pendulum with a hemispherical shaped hammer nose, 12.7 mm in diameter. Each specimen is placed inside a special fixture which includes two large plates, each having a window 12.5 cm × 7.5 cm to allow for the contact with the hammer from one side and likely optical view by an infrared imaging device from the other one [7]. The impact energy varied between 5 and 15 J and is set by suitably adjusting the falling height of the Charpy arm.…”
Section: Impact Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impact tests are carried out with a modified Charpy pendulum with a hemispherical shaped hammer nose, 12.7 mm in diameter. Each specimen is placed inside a special fixture which includes two large plates, each having a window 12.5 cm × 7.5 cm to allow for the contact with the hammer from one side and likely optical view by an infrared imaging device from the other one [7]. The impact energy varied between 5 and 15 J and is set by suitably adjusting the falling height of the Charpy arm.…”
Section: Impact Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las fibras de basalto, debido a su composición, proporcionan alta rigidez al compuesto, pero, en contraste, los compuestos de basalto no pueden soportar grandes deformaciones [34]. Analizando los paneles compuestos con el mismo número de fibras de basalto y lino (BLSLB y LBSBL), puede verse que la distribución de las fibras no afecta la energía al impacto (ver Figura 2), con valores de energía absorbida de 55-56 kJ/m 2 , que están en concordancia con los resultados reportados por Fiore et al [35].…”
Section: Figuraunclassified
“…25 Stitching reinforcement and Z-pin reinforcement have reduced in-plane properties of the laminates, which could introduce defects, and also have the disadvantages of difficult implantation of Z-pin/stitching on thermoplastic composites. [26][27][28][29] Fiber veil reinforcement has been shown to have a positive impact on the out-of-face mechanical properties of laminates, such as reduced impact damage and increased service life. [30][31][32][33] Zhang et al 34 used a fiber veil to reinforce magnesium-based composite laminates, resulting in the effective reinforcement of flexural strength and impact resistance of the composite laminates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D weaving would result in material waste and currently requires resin transfer molding (RTM), which has a high cost 25 . Stitching reinforcement and Z‐pin reinforcement have reduced in‐plane properties of the laminates, which could introduce defects, and also have the disadvantages of difficult implantation of Z‐pin/stitching on thermoplastic composites 26–29 . Fiber veil reinforcement has been shown to have a positive impact on the out‐of‐face mechanical properties of laminates, such as reduced impact damage and increased service life 30–33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%