Inmate Recidivism as a Measure of Private Prison Performance

Abstract

The growth of the private corrections industry has elicited interest in the comparative performance of state and private prisons. One way to measure the service quality of private prisons is to examine inmates' postrelease performance. Current empirical evidence is limited to four studies, all conducted in Florida. This analysis replicates and adds to the Florida measures in a different state and enhances previous methods. It uses data for a large cohort of Oklahoma state prison inmates released between 1997 and 2001. Controlling for known covariates, multivariate survival analysis revealed comparative rates of reincarceration for inmates in multiple exposure and comparison groups. These results are unique among prior studies on this topic; private prison inmates had a greater hazard of recidivism in all eight models tested, six of which were statistically significant. Finding no empirical support for claims of superior service from private corrections, the authors discuss policy implications and prospects for future research.

Private Prisons in Public Discourse: Measuring Moral Legitimacy

“…The use of private prisons in practice increasingly rendered questions of morality moot, and it gave policymakers and the public more empirical "data" regarding their actual performance. Although private prison proponents hardly had an easy time making their case on the basis of objective performance evaluations (e.g., Camp and Daggett 2005;Makarios and Maahs 2012;Perrone andPratt 2003, Spivak andSharp 2008), they could at least summon their own evidence to support their arguments. This shift in attention to more instrumental matters, signaling a diminishing dissonance between the policy itself and the moral environment, probably made it easier for policymakers to either adopt private prisons or increase their use of them.…”

The Influence of Prison Staff on Inmate Conditions: A Multilevel Approach to Staff and Inmate Surveys

“…Consequently, and according to importation theory, the influence of a prison on perceived prison conditions and inmate behaviour is rather small, or even absent. Over the past decades, several studies have confirmed the assumption that characteristics of inmates (their criminal history, identification with criminal values, attitudes towards the legal system, the age of inmates, prior incarcerations, the length of the current sentence, their race, and their gender) are important predictors of inmate perceptions of prison conditions and deviant behaviour (Bales et al 2005;Camp et al 2003;Gendreau et al 1997;Harer and Steffensmeier 1996;Lindquist and Lindquist 1997;Paterline and Petersen 1999;Spivak and Sharp 2008;Steiner 2009;Steiner and Wooldredge 2008;Wright 1991).…”

Towards a liberatory ethics of care framework for organizing social change

“…The prefix 'neo' refers to the reemergence and renewed implementation of this economic policy beginning in the late 1970s and 1980s, largely stemming from the United States. What began as an economic policy influenced by specific manifestations of liberal thought has grown into widespread ideology (Nafstad et al, 2007;Sastry & Dutta, 2013;Spivak & Sharp, 2008). The economic growth, largely experienced by those with preexisting power, that was associated with neoliberal economic policy incentivized decision makers in several sectors to make use of similar logic to rethink and restructure various aspects of society.…”