2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2018.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innate immunity and cnidarian-Symbiodiniaceae mutualism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
88
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
4
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, immune processes such as neurotransmitter binding, transcription regulation, cellular communication, and biological adhesion, were only regulated after the MOB challenge, while scavenger receptor activity, hormone metabolic processes, and cell killing were vigorously modulated after the V. alginolyticus challenge. These ndings con rmed the involvement of cell communication and cell adhesion in Bathymodiolinae symbiosis, which could also be observed in holobionts such as coral and squid [2,[43][44][45]. Comparatively, scavenger receptor activity and cell killing were also well known in pathogen induced immune response with indispensable role in the elimination of pathogens [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Global Immune Response Of Gigantidas Against Mobs and Nonsymsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…For example, immune processes such as neurotransmitter binding, transcription regulation, cellular communication, and biological adhesion, were only regulated after the MOB challenge, while scavenger receptor activity, hormone metabolic processes, and cell killing were vigorously modulated after the V. alginolyticus challenge. These ndings con rmed the involvement of cell communication and cell adhesion in Bathymodiolinae symbiosis, which could also be observed in holobionts such as coral and squid [2,[43][44][45]. Comparatively, scavenger receptor activity and cell killing were also well known in pathogen induced immune response with indispensable role in the elimination of pathogens [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Global Immune Response Of Gigantidas Against Mobs and Nonsymsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Colonization by beneficial symbionts might lead to the suppression of the host immune response, or symbionts have evolved ways to avoid the host immune response. Similar mechanisms occur in other symbioses, such as squid and Aliivibrio fischeri 30 ; rhizobia, which are the nitrogen-fixing bacteria inside the root nodules of legumes 31 ; and sea anemones and dinoflagellate algae 32 . Thus, the acquisition of a diverse bacterial community in early life may be possible because the coral has not yet developed a fully functional immune system 33 .…”
Section: [H1] Space Time and Host-specificitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…As the sister group to bilaterians, cnidarians have a complex innate immune system that is implicated in recognising pathogens and managing beneficial microorganisms, including endosymbionts. Previous transcriptomic analyses comparing aposymbiotic to symbiotic Aiptasia larvae and adult animals revealed several immune-related genes to be downregulated in response to symbiosis (reviewed in Mansfield and Gilmore, 2018). Specifically, symbionts have been proposed to induce immune suppression through NF-κB downregulation, possibly via TGFbsignalling (Berthelier et al, 2017;Detournay et al, 2012;Mansfield et al, 2019Mansfield et al, , 2017.…”
Section: Symbiosis Establishment Broadly Suppresses Host Cell Immunitmentioning
confidence: 99%