2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inner speech as language process and cognitive tool

Charles Fernyhough,
Anna M. Borghi
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is through stories that we make sense of the world around us 3,4 , shaping our understanding of reality [5][6][7][8] . This intrinsic connection between storytelling and the human experience underscores not just the importance of narratives in preserving cultural heritage [9][10][11] , but also in the construction and expression of the self [12][13][14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is through stories that we make sense of the world around us 3,4 , shaping our understanding of reality [5][6][7][8] . This intrinsic connection between storytelling and the human experience underscores not just the importance of narratives in preserving cultural heritage [9][10][11] , but also in the construction and expression of the self [12][13][14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In terms of questionnaire-based studies, self-talk for self-regulation responses had weak-tomoderately strong relationships with various inner speech measures in one study [18] and with types of inner dialogues (e.g., identity, rumination) in another study [19]. In essence, there is a connection between overt and covert self-talk, and they both share self-regulatory functions, although they cannot be equated because the development, phenomenology, and functional range of covert and overt self-talk vary [20]. Even though there are other forms of experimental and neurobiological evidence for the usefulness of self-talk in self-regulation, conceptualizations as well as various questionnaire tools are still in the development stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Additionally, not only may some questionnaires be built on a priori notions about the nature of psychological constructs, but participants can have a priori or misinformed notions about constructs as well as the nature of their own minds. Moreover, those who report experiencing inner speech vary widely in their responses, and researchers do not yet know if everyone experiences inner speech [20]. There is an unfortunate stigma attached to "being caught" in the act of talking to oneself, which may affect people's awareness of their own experience and their willingness to disclose.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, it is suggested that the acquisition of new motor skills is guided by the drive to explore (curiosity) and supported equally by the developing nervous system and its interactions with sensory-motor processes and the environment (Bernstein, 1967;Gibson, 1979;Thelen and Smith, 1998;Oudeyer et al, 2016;Schillaci et al, 2016). Moreover, there is mounting evidence (Alderson-Day and Fernyhough, 2015;Fernyhough and Borghi, 2023) that such process of cognitive development is accompanied by the evolution of inner or covert speech that associates a symbolic component to the maturation of subsymbolic sensorimotor capabilities. Such linguistic component has also been linked to the role of inner speech in working memory (Miyake and Shah, 1999), namely the retention of information "online, " critical for a complex task.…”
Section: Principles Of Developmental Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%