2010
DOI: 10.1002/ca.20982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innervation of the supinator muscle and its relationship to two‐incision distal biceps tendon repair: An anatomic study

Abstract: Reinsertion of the ruptured distal biceps tendon has been performed using either a single-anterior incision or a two-incision approach. A systematic review of these two repair methods has identified a higher incidence of supination weakness following the two-incision approach. The objective of this study was to describe the innervation of the supinator muscle and its implications regarding a two-incision distal biceps repair. Twelve fresh upper extremity specimens from 12 males were dissected with the forearm … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chavan et al [9] meta-analysis reported a significant increase in unsatisfactory results with a twoincision approach (31 vs. 6% in the single-incision group), mostly because of loss of forearm rotation or supination strength. It is believed that this was caused by robust dissection between the radius and the ulna, leading to denervation or damage of the supinator [18,19]. Complication rates were similar between the two groups (18% in the single-incision group vs. 16% in the twoincision group); however, the single-incision group had a higher rate of nerve injury (12%) whereas the twoincision group had more loss of forearm rotation (9%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Chavan et al [9] meta-analysis reported a significant increase in unsatisfactory results with a twoincision approach (31 vs. 6% in the single-incision group), mostly because of loss of forearm rotation or supination strength. It is believed that this was caused by robust dissection between the radius and the ulna, leading to denervation or damage of the supinator [18,19]. Complication rates were similar between the two groups (18% in the single-incision group vs. 16% in the twoincision group); however, the single-incision group had a higher rate of nerve injury (12%) whereas the twoincision group had more loss of forearm rotation (9%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The NV anatomy of the cubital fossa is complex and variable, and various studies have described anatomical patterns without surgically useful reference points 4 12–15. Extensive dissection of these structures is often not performed in most surgical procedures, and iatrogenic NV injury is possible 5 10 11 16.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Partial denervation of the supinator muscle during the two-incision approach could be an explanation for this common complication. Duquin et al 41 found that, in 25% of their specimens, at least one nerve branch runs close to the radial tuberosity when the forearm is in pronation (as is the case during two-incision approach).…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%