The Professionalization of Public Participation 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315637983-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovating Public Participation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has suggested that PPP either hold instrumental views on public participation, focusing on effective policy making and legitimacy, or ethical views, focusing on community building and education (Lewanski & Ravazzi 2017;Bherer & Breux 2012). Interpretation of respective statements in our Q-study across the different factors supports this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Previous research has suggested that PPP either hold instrumental views on public participation, focusing on effective policy making and legitimacy, or ethical views, focusing on community building and education (Lewanski & Ravazzi 2017;Bherer & Breux 2012). Interpretation of respective statements in our Q-study across the different factors supports this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Thus, PPPs cannot be seen as a homogenous group (Bherer et al 2017b). Lewanski and Ravazzi (2017) conclude that the practitioners' culture plays a key role for the process design and map a divided participatory culture in Italy. Even though PPP share basic ideas on public participation such as improving democracy, impartiality, transparency and the need for early problem definition, the authors identify strong disagreement with regard to the desirable outcomes of public participation.…”
Section: Ppp's Role In Public Participation Processes and Previous Re...mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations