“…IP rules, for both protection and access, are both a cause and a result of economic activity: it is hard to tell when changes in markets for goods and services affect IP policies and practices and when changes in IP policies and practices affect markets for goods and services. Growth in economic development and IP protections have been uneven, varying not just by region (developed versus developing parts of the world), but also by industrial sector, and are found especially among knowledge intensive industries such as genomics and digital technology, and in places hospitable to them, such as Singapore (Baber, ; Fai & Morgan, ), and Silicon Valley. Arguments for IP access , on the other hand, are more in evidence in regions and communities where basic knowledge via schooling is most in demand and least in evidence.…”