Innovation for Social Change

Michelini, Laura

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32150-4_1

Cited by 4 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently academic research offered various perspectives of the business model innovation concept, such as the social business model that is “ inherently and explicitly social” in its mission and purpose (Yunus et al. , 2010; Michelini, 2012; Wilson and Post, 2013). An emerging body of literature is focused on how SEOs innovate their own business model (Lee, 2015; Rahdari et al.…”

Section: Background and Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Yunus et al. , 2010; Michelini, 2012), that SEOs have to face, such as: lack of financial resources; locally embedded knowledge, skills and experience to be leveraged; learning by doing, experimenting trial and error; poor institutional support. These contingencies lead SEOs to make choices aimed at establishing and maintaining the social component.…”

Section: Background and Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, 2008; Yunus et al. , 2010; Michelini, 2012). Second, we extend and enrich studies on social bricolage (Di Domenico et al.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Social bricolage and business model innovation: a framework for social entrepreneurship organizations

Scuotto

Cicellin

Consiglio

2022

JSBED

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe last two decades have witnessed a surge of interest in social entrepreneurship organizations (SEOs). Understanding their business models is crucial for sustaining their long-term growth. This paper analyses how SEOs that use the approach of social bricolage adapt their business model to develop social innovation.Design/methodology/approachThis study used in-depth multiple comparative case studies and narrative analysis to focus on the South of Italy, where these ventures play a crucial role in the entrepreneurial process of minor and abandoned cultural heritage sites, generating economic and social value and employment opportunities.FindingsBy developing a conceptual framework, this paper enhances current understanding of the social dimensions of SEOs’ business model. These ventures using the approach of social bricolage can produce social innovation, reinventing and innovating their business model. The business model innovation of the cases revealed a strong social mark and identified peculiar strategies that both respond to social needs and long-term sustainability in complex contexts.Practical implicationsThis study connects previous knowledge on social bricolage with the business model innovation, highlighting routines and processes used by ventures, and provides a starting point for social entrepreneurs and innovators in the complex and often uncertain cultural domain of the Third Sector in Italy.Originality/valueThe paper aims to contribute to the literature on SEOs by exploring their main features and social dimensions. By combining social bricolage and business model innovation, it offers a novel conceptual framework for developing social innovation and for the study of SEOs.

show abstract

Section: Background and Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Background and Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Social bricolage and business model innovation: a framework for social entrepreneurship organizations

Scuotto

Cicellin

Consiglio

2022

JSBED

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Prahalad and Hammond [7] argue that these BoP models are new sources of growth for multinational companies. It is known that the creation of shared value is more influential when companies expand their business to developing countries and target low-income markets [17].…”

Section: Socially Responsible Corporate Activitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study compares two different types of socially responsible corporate activities: (1) CSV, a recent paradigm in which the interests of private companies and societal problems are fully connected [17]; and (2) philanthropic giving, a reactive strategy to counter stakeholder demands, threats of government intrusion, and escalating public expectations [18,19]. CSV, as a newly suggested paradigm, still receives significant criticism [20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impacts of Socially Responsible Corporate Activities on Korean Consumers’ Corporate Evaluations in the Agrifood Industry

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The variety of socially responsible corporate activities employed in the agrifood industry has been broadening. An increasing number of agrifood companies have been employing strategic approaches to socially responsible activities, reinforced by Porter and Kramer's concept of creating shared value (CSV). This study compares the effects on corporate evaluations of two socially responsible corporate activities: philanthropic giving and CSV. Because prior studies concerning the effects of corporate prosocial behaviors on consumer responses have yielded mixed results, the present study examines the effects of a priori perceptions of companies by using corporate stereotypes as moderators. The results show that the type of socially responsible corporate activity (CSV vs. philanthropic giving) does not influence corporate evaluations. However, in cases of CSV (vs. philanthropic giving), consumers evaluate an unwarm but competent company more attractively and place higher value on an incompetent but warm company. This research is important not only for enriching existing literature, but also for providing guidelines to practitioners with respect to selecting appropriate corporate initiatives based on perceived consumer stereotypes.

show abstract

Co-creation Strategy in Empowering Indigenous Women’s Innovation in Indonesia: Empirical Evidence of Weaver Community Entrepreneurs in West Nusa Tenggara

Kusumastuti,

Virgianita,

Juwono

2023

Contributions to Environmental Sciences &Amp; Innovative Business Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovation for Social Change

Cited by 4 publications

References 11 publications

Social bricolage and business model innovation: a framework for social entrepreneurship organizations

Social bricolage and business model innovation: a framework for social entrepreneurship organizations

Impacts of Socially Responsible Corporate Activities on Korean Consumers’ Corporate Evaluations in the Agrifood Industry

Co-creation Strategy in Empowering Indigenous Women’s Innovation in Indonesia: Empirical Evidence of Weaver Community Entrepreneurs in West Nusa Tenggara

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About