Innovation of prediction equations for milk composition estimation in milk recording at alternative sampling and half a day milking interval

Abstract

At dairying cost reduction and effort about maintenance of milk recording (MR) range the MR cost decrease is also important. Aim was to revise the older prediction equations for alternative reduced milk sampling (morning – M or evening – E) for assurance of MR reliable results at twice milking a day (TMD) with balanced interval 12/12. Individual milk samples (n = 619 animals) were obtained during TMD (M, E and REF; n = 1 857 samples). Fat (F), protein (P), lactose (L) and somatic cell count (SCC) were analysed. Czech Fleckvieh and Holstein breeds were included. The reference values (REF) of day milking were obtained in regular MR (A4P). M and E milking results were related to the REF. Older prediction equations with lower validity because of time and breeding were revised: a) for F from M on REF y = 0.6932x + 1.381, where r = 0.752 and P ≤ 0.001; b) for P from M on REF y = 0.9432x + 0.2274, where r = 0.949 and P ≤ 0.001; c) for L from E on REF y = 0.8145x + 0.9095, where r = 0.87 and P ≤ 0.001; d) for log SCC from E on REF y = 0.8829x + 0.2367, where r = 0.94 and P ≤ 0.001. MR cost reduction is possible using method of alternative sampling including corresponding prediction equations.

Reliability of Milk Recording Data Under Conditions of Automatic Milking System

“…Many authors were interested in estimations of the total milk yield results and conversions from various sub-options of sampling during milking from methodical point of view (Lee and Wardorp, 1984;Palmer et al, 1994;Lee et al, 1995;Liu et al, 2000;Klopčič et al, 2003;Gantner et al, 2008Gantner et al, , 2009Hanuš et al, 2011Hanuš et al, , 2012. Multiple daily milking can include regular and irregular intervals, which are o en an essential part of the technology process in automated milking systems (Galesloot and Peeters, 2000;Bouloc et al, 2002;Bünger et al, 2002;Lazenby et al, 2002;Amodeo and Tondo, 2006;ICAR, 2008ICAR, , 2010Chládek et al, 2009 a, b).…”