Innovation security of cross-border innovative milieu

Mikhaylov, Andrey S.; Mikhaylova, Anna A.; Savchina, Oksana V.

doi:10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(19)

Cited by 17 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sagiyeva et al [4] emphasizes intellectual input. Mikhaylov et al [5] similarly stress role of innovation. Other authors claim that state plays important role in creating favourable conditions e.g., [6][7][8][9][10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of Smart Switchboard Placement to Enhance Distribution System Reliability

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One way of handling short-time short-circuits without causing equipment failure is the management of the reclose function integrated into smart switchboard which is described in this article. Due to the cost of the application, the optimal placement of such equipment must be well-planned. During the planning of the placement optimization of a low-voltage electricity network quality, the increase of the consumer supply security must be considered along with the best economic utilization. The research presented in this article aims to introduce a new special decision support methodology calculated with these variables. The management of smart switchboard (SSB) tool installation into low voltage (LV) network was investigated. The selection of the placement nodes is based on the complex investigation of the network characteristics. Investigation is performed by empiric analysis. This method can support the power companies to make the optimal decision. The presented new device can have outstanding importance for the electric industry and for further research as no testing results of such investigations have been published yet. 101 Narimani et al. [20] provides a framework for the allocation of a central electricity storage facility 102 (EES) in discrete communities, which is created as segmentation along rural energy supplies where 103 the installation of cross connectors is not economical or even feasible. Modeling of the impact of 104 automation failure on distribution system reliability is presented in paper [21]. Reinders [22] focuses 105 on the reliability of electricity supply at three different locations in Indonesia by comparing reported 106 energy reliability indices (SAIFI and SAIDI). A common FLISR approach is to use error indicator (FI) 107 signals with distribution network states [23].108 2. The Smart Switchboard 109 The smart switchboard (SSB) developed by AD&TE is a low voltage distribution switchboard 110 which, under the described maintenance and operational circumstances during its entire life cycle 111 and without the partial or total change of the equipment, interrupts the overcurrent or the short-112 circuit current up to the value defined by the manufacturer, compliant to the applicable standards.113 The SSB detects the overcurrent with the combined usage of the local measure-and evaluation system 114 [24]. The operation happens according to the predefined current-time curve. The equipment is 115 remote, thus the existence of tension (yes/no) at each measuring point, the effective and inefficient 116 current components, the tension and the calculated performance data based on tension-with the 117 application of the security protocols in the related standards-is forwarded to a centre by using 118 wireless communication. The SSB can be operated remotely, accordingly, it is suitable for performing 119 remote switching operations. In order to the secure feasibility of the planned tasks the remote 120 operation can be blocked in-site and has visible breakdown point and earthing possibility. The 121 eq...

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of Smart Switchboard Placement to Enhance Distribution System Reliability

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…National specificities, as well as peculiarities of the localisation and the genetics of historical development embodied in the constants of 'city geometry' and the division of functions between urban centres, influence these changes. Both the catalysing and inhibiting trajectories are possible, as some elements of previous structure contradict the desired changes (Mikhaylov et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatial configuration of Rostov agglomeration in southwestern Russia – territorial, demographical and functional dynamics

Gorochnaya

Mikhaylov

2020

hgeo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cities around the world are central locations for economic activity, industrial production, research and innovation. Urban environment is a favourable locus for entrepreneurship and living, accumulating a significant share of regional and national administrative, financial and human resources, concentrating advanced public infrastructure and social sector services. In the process of regional development, the integration and coherence between cities strengthen, the functions are redefined, and the specialisation deepens, while the role of the central city(-ies) is reinforced. Consideration of inter-city intraagglomeration socioeconomic integrity and functional interconnectivity is vital for efficient governance. However, the blurred boundaries of urban agglomerations impede elaboration of place-specific development policies on urban and regional growth. Our study is aimed at delimitation of urban agglomeration structure around the Rostov-on-Don-one of the ten largest cities of Russia and the administrative centre of the Southern federal district. Results suggest that Rostov agglomeration continues to evolve with a different level of integrity between city clusters of the three agglomeration arcs. We find that industrial clustering and transportation network determine the developmental trajectory of the urban agglomeration, shaping its spatial configuration and causing pathdependency.

show abstract

“…The development of cross-border regions is of great importance for improving efficiency and regional proportions of the economy. Cross-border cooperation is the most natural function of border areas and one of the main factors contributing to their development (Zigern-Korn, Sevast'yanov 2009;Tvaronavičienė, 2017;Mikhaylov et al 2018). Border areas define the formation of cross-border ties, which form the basis of cross-border regionalism.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-border tourism cooperation as a basis for sustainable development: a case study

Дунец¹,

Ivanova²,

Poltarykhin³

2019

JESI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article presents critical review of approaches to understanding cross-border tourism cooperation. The authors substantiate peculiarities of tourism development in the mountain region, revealing the possible influence of tourism on the border regions, which can be both positive and negative. The paper examines five types of cross-border tourist structures using the example of the Altai-Sayan mountain region. Those types determine the direction and potential of cross-border tourism cooperation. The authors consider the possibilities of organizing the development of various types of tourism in the border area. Tourism can contribute to the sustainable development of a mountainous transboundary region.

show abstract

Innovation security of cross-border innovative milieu

Cited by 17 publications

References 28 publications

Management of Smart Switchboard Placement to Enhance Distribution System Reliability

Management of Smart Switchboard Placement to Enhance Distribution System Reliability

Spatial configuration of Rostov agglomeration in southwestern Russia – territorial, demographical and functional dynamics

Cross-border tourism cooperation as a basis for sustainable development: a case study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About