2020
DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation Uncertainty Impacts the Adoption of Smarter Farming Approaches

Abstract: Eastwood and Renwick Uncertainty and Smart Farming Adoption Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that this study received funding from Dairy Australia and DairyNZ Inc. These funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, or the decision to submit it for publication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important aspect to consider in addition to technical feasibility is whether these particular types of technologies would likely be adopted by farmers since the widespread uptake of precision technologies thus far has been rather slow, including in dairy farming as a result of "innovation uncertainty" (Eastwood and Renwick, 2020). In their study, Vigors and Lawrence (2019) interviewed farmers on their perception of positive animal welfare and found that as a whole, farmers prioritized the reduction of negative experiences, and mostly considered that by doing so, positive welfare would arise as a result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important aspect to consider in addition to technical feasibility is whether these particular types of technologies would likely be adopted by farmers since the widespread uptake of precision technologies thus far has been rather slow, including in dairy farming as a result of "innovation uncertainty" (Eastwood and Renwick, 2020). In their study, Vigors and Lawrence (2019) interviewed farmers on their perception of positive animal welfare and found that as a whole, farmers prioritized the reduction of negative experiences, and mostly considered that by doing so, positive welfare would arise as a result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 13 ]). Effectively addressing them is nonetheless crucial for realizing the full potential and societal benefits of agricultural digitalization [ 1 , 8 ]. Inter- and transdisciplinary approaches are promising, but they can be hampered by practical and conceptual challenges, including entrenched attitudes, biases and institutionalized disciplinary inequalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7: 201511 Box 1 provides a legal analogy of the three-level framework we propose. 8 Such an analogy is equally applicable to agricultural regulation where policymakers frequently decide regulatory measures based on uncertain modelled information and myriad other contextual factors-all of which can introduce diverse uncertainties for policymakers, modellers and farmers. While the example in box 1 illustrates our three-level conceptual distinction, two points warrant clarification before reflecting on the usefulness of this framework in interdisciplinary research.…”
Section: ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations