2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2015.7402868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovations-based priority assignment for control over CAN-like networks

Abstract: Innovations-based priority assignment for control over CAN-like networks.In: 54th IEEE Conference on Abstract-We present an innovations-based prioritization mechanism to efficiently use network resources for data gathering, without compromising the real-time decision making capability of the control systems. In the envisioned protocol, each sensor assigns the Value of Information (VoI) contained in its current observations for the network as the priority. Tournaments are used to compare priorities and assign … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To capture the dynamic nature of WNCSs and allow for flexibility, dynamic schedulers have been proposed where, at each instance, a scheduling unit grants channel access based on evaluation of some objective function. For instance, [5], [6] use the discrepancy in state estimates as the objective, [7]- [9] base their evaluation on the growth of the standard quadratic T. Farjam cost (penalizing the error from the deviation from the desired state and the magnitude of the control action), while [10], [11] consider the transmission power consumption in calculations as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture the dynamic nature of WNCSs and allow for flexibility, dynamic schedulers have been proposed where, at each instance, a scheduling unit grants channel access based on evaluation of some objective function. For instance, [5], [6] use the discrepancy in state estimates as the objective, [7]- [9] base their evaluation on the growth of the standard quadratic T. Farjam cost (penalizing the error from the deviation from the desired state and the magnitude of the control action), while [10], [11] consider the transmission power consumption in calculations as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is closely connected to the VOI in [19] which is used in a prioritization mechanism for multi-sensor scheduling.…”
Section: Value Of Information and The Self-triggering Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cost is based on the statistical properties of the sensor measurements. We consider both the scenario where the communication is guaranteed to be successfully completed when a channel is allocated to a specific channel, such as in CAN-like network scenarios for communications [14], and the more general scenario where packet losses may occur during transmission [2]. The channel seen by each agent has different statistical properties, hence each agent has a different probability of success on each channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the works of [12], [14], we analyze our setup for the LQG scenario, but unlike their approach, our work does not use current measurements. The communications resources are limited and as a result, which agents are allowed to transmit and which communication resource is allocated to each agent has to be carefully designed by a remote decision maker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation