2022
DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-22-00242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovations in Public Financing for Family Planning at Subnational Levels: Sustainable Cofinancing Strategies for Family Planning With Nigerian States

Abstract: From 2018 to 2022, The Challenge Initiative (TCI) employed a cofinancing strategy in Nigeria to support states in their family planning and reproductive health (FP/RH) budget allocations and expenditures.n Thirteen states accessed and used a total of 2.03 billion Nigerian naira (US$5.6 million) from the TCI Challenge Fund, a mechanism to incentivize domestic funding for FP programming.n State governments demonstrated substantial improvements in their fiscal commitment and releases with a 4-year average of 78.7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Igharo et al 14 discuss the threat to development financing in Nigeria posed by declining donor funding, low government accountability, and weak governance. These problems were compounded for FP-related funding due to the limited understanding among policymakers of how investments contributed to the country’s broader health and development goals.…”
Section: Scaling and Sustainability Of Family Planning Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Igharo et al 14 discuss the threat to development financing in Nigeria posed by declining donor funding, low government accountability, and weak governance. These problems were compounded for FP-related funding due to the limited understanding among policymakers of how investments contributed to the country’s broader health and development goals.…”
Section: Scaling and Sustainability Of Family Planning Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenges in Nigeria include inadequate domestic funding for FP programs, limited human resource and monitoring and evaluation capacity, and weak health systems. [11][12][13][14][15] State governments in Nigeria have the autonomy to decide how to manage their health budget annually; prioritization of FP in those budgets varies between states depending on other competing priorities, government capacity, and program implementation. Suboptimal state FP program response is further compounded by weak government capacity to institutionalize and scale up proven FP interventions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%