Background: The pre-extraction overbuilding procedure was designed with the intent to mitigate buccal bone resorption following tooth extraction. This study aimed to address this gap by comparing the efficacy of pre-extraction and juxta-extraction buccal overbuilding treatments in preserving buccal bone volume following tooth extraction. Material and Methods: At the test sites (pre-extraction sites), an alveolar crest overbuilding was performed on the buccal aspect of the distal root of the fourth premolar using a xenograft covered with a collagen membrane. No treatment was applied at the control sites. After 3 months, the distal roots of both fourth premolars were extracted and the alveoli were filled with a collagenated xenograft. An overbuilt procedure was performed also at the control sites (juxta-extraction sites). After 3 months, biopsies were collected.
Results: at the clinical evaluation, the buccal bone crest was apical to the lingual bone crest 1.4 mm and 1.2 mm at the pre-extraction and juxta-extraction sites, respectively. At the histological evaluation, the resorption of the buccal bone was 3.2 mm at the pre-extraction sites, and 3.3 mm at the juxta-extraction sites. New bone originated from the residual pre-existing bone crest in an attempt to restore the original dimension.
Conclusion: the buccal overbuilding procedures conducted before and at the time of tooth extraction did not aid in preserving the buccal bone crest. Nevertheless, indications of ongoing bone regeneration were evident within the augmented space maintained by the biomaterial, suggesting that a prolonged healing time might be required to attain optimal outcomes.