“…The results indicate that existing theories, for example, Hu et al ( 2019), Riaz et al (2022), Wei et al (2018), and Liu and Li (2017), cannot solve the DM issue because the data form the structure of the BCFS. Hu et al (2019) can merely solve the data in the model of CFS and cannot tackle the negative aspects, while Riaz et al (2022) and Wei et al (2018) merely resolve the information in the setting of the BFS and cannot overcome the second dimension, and Liu and Li (2017) merely resolve the information in the model of IVIFS and cannot address the second dimension and negative aspects. Furthermore, the results show that BM AO (BCF Bonferroni mean AO) (Mahmood et al, 2022b) for the BCFS and the DM approach handle the data and give us the result that M BCFS−4 is the finest choice, but anyone can say that this decision or selection is biased and not fair because of the weight vector that the decision analyst provides to each attribute on his own choice, for example, in this case, we take the weight vector (0.08, 0.06, 0.06, 0.8) and u v 2.…”