Well test in Banyu Urip (BU) field employs 2-phase Test Separator equipped with Coriolis Meters to measure gross liquid rate and density for water cut calculation. As BU matures, obtaining water cut data during well test is crucial for well surveillance and scale management. However, there are challenges to precisely and accurately measure water cut as it evolves. This paper shares insights to improve precision and accuracy of water cut measurement during well test.
The well test accuracy is validated by comparing produced water (PW) rate from process flow meter at Primary Separators with those derived from Coriolis Meter at Test Separator. The process flow meter's accuracy is ensured through range adjustments following actual rate. In early year, water cut data from Coriolis Meter was inaccurate as indicated by significant PW balance gap. This finding prompted investigation through High-Pressure High-Temperature (HPHT) test analysis, collaboration with manufacturer, and process simulation. Lab test emerged as the primary method to measure water cut by manual sampling at inlet Coriolis Meter during well test.
Upon increasing PW rate, discrepancies between PW rate derived from well test manual sampling and process flow meters showed an upswing, reaching 27% gap. This swing was mainly caused by inconsistency in obtaining homogenous oil-water mixture from sampling branch. Hence, examination of Coriolis Meter's accuracy was imperative as it can precisely capture representative sample.
An investigation uncovered gas entrainment in preserved liquid sample by testing it in HPHT. The gas lowered actual density from Coriolis Meter below than reference density at the same pressure and temperature, resulting into significant PW balance gap during low water cut operation. Two potential root causes were identified: gas carry under and gas flashing. Vessel sizing verification confirmed adequacy of existing Test Separator in preventing gas carry under, leading to conclusion that gas flashing due to friction loss was the root cause.
To address this, the water cut calculation was modified by incorporating an empirical correction factor for gas entrainment, including operation strategy to minimize it. This proved pivotal to improve well test accuracy, reducing PW balance gap to 5%. The improved PW rate precision and accuracy contributed to benefits for well allocation, Voidage Replacement Ratio management, and scale inhibitor effectiveness.
Typical gas entrainment issue can be found at liquid leaving separator in saturated condition, thus effecting meter accuracy. Adjusting liquid level upwards can mitigate gas flashing by providing additional static head to compensate friction loss. However, this poses the risk of high-high liquid level trip, especially for slugging well. Therefore, addressing gas entrainment issue by good Test Separator operation strategy and reliable water cut calculation is critical to get accurate and precise well test data.