2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2014.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative fluorescence spectroscopic techniques for rapidly characterising oil inclusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TSF had the same test procedures with the QGF‐E. The UV excitation wavelength and the recorded emission wavelength of the TSF spectra had values of 220–340 and 250–540 nm, respectively, and were different from those of the QGF and QGF‐E (Liu et al, ). The R 1 of TSF was a ratio of fluorescence intensities at 360 nm over that at 320 nm corresponding to the 270 nm excitation wavelength (Equation ; Liu et al, ).…”
Section: Sampling and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The TSF had the same test procedures with the QGF‐E. The UV excitation wavelength and the recorded emission wavelength of the TSF spectra had values of 220–340 and 250–540 nm, respectively, and were different from those of the QGF and QGF‐E (Liu et al, ). The R 1 of TSF was a ratio of fluorescence intensities at 360 nm over that at 320 nm corresponding to the 270 nm excitation wavelength (Equation ; Liu et al, ).…”
Section: Sampling and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R 1 of TSF was a ratio of fluorescence intensities at 360 nm over that at 320 nm corresponding to the 270 nm excitation wavelength (Equation ; Liu et al, ). The R 1 values had a negative relationship with the hydrocarbon maturity (Liu et al, ). R10.5em=0.5emI360nm/I320nm@Ex270nm, where I means the fluorescence intensity; “Ex” means the excitation wavelength.…”
Section: Sampling and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations