2017
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative haematological parameters for early diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients admitted in intensive care unit

Abstract: IPF# and RET% may provide valuable clinical information for predicting the risk of developing sepsis, thus allowing early management of patients before the onset of clinically evident systemic infections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased levels of IPF were found to significantly correlate with infection as determined by positive blood cultures (positive blood culture: mean IPF 4.86%; negative blood culture: mean IPF 1.79%, p < 0.0001) even if patients were non-thrombocytopenic, indicating subliminal platelet consumption [116]. IPF increased before the onset of sepsis by a median of 2 days [117,119,121], was independent from other coagulation parameters [118,120] and predicted mortality [119,122]. The diagnostic performance of IPF (AUC = 0.82 [121], AUC = 0.87 [120]) in the discrimination of septic patients from non-septic patients was comparable with current biomarkers of infection such as c-reactive protein (CRP; AUC = 0.81 [121], AUC = 0.94 [120]) and procalcitonin (AUC = 0.92) [120].…”
Section: Infectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Increased levels of IPF were found to significantly correlate with infection as determined by positive blood cultures (positive blood culture: mean IPF 4.86%; negative blood culture: mean IPF 1.79%, p < 0.0001) even if patients were non-thrombocytopenic, indicating subliminal platelet consumption [116]. IPF increased before the onset of sepsis by a median of 2 days [117,119,121], was independent from other coagulation parameters [118,120] and predicted mortality [119,122]. The diagnostic performance of IPF (AUC = 0.82 [121], AUC = 0.87 [120]) in the discrimination of septic patients from non-septic patients was comparable with current biomarkers of infection such as c-reactive protein (CRP; AUC = 0.81 [121], AUC = 0.94 [120]) and procalcitonin (AUC = 0.92) [120].…”
Section: Infectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While the cause of thrombocytopenia in sepsis may be multifactorial, increased platelet consumption due to an uncontrolled procoagulant response with thrombin formation and septic coagulopathy play a main role [114,115]. In this respect it was recognized that reticulated platelets provide meaningful information for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with sepsis [116][117][118][119][120][121][122]. Increased levels of IPF were found to significantly correlate with infection as determined by positive blood cultures (positive blood culture: mean IPF 4.86%; negative blood culture: mean IPF 1.79%, p < 0.0001) even if patients were non-thrombocytopenic, indicating subliminal platelet consumption [116].…”
Section: Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, even though thrombocytopenia can be seen in infections, A-IPCs are generally maintained so that at least platelet production attempts to keep up with the higher consumption (52); yet such A-IPC increases appear to correlate with higher mortality risk and disease severity in septic patients (53). These increases in immature platelets have been reported to occur earlier in patients prior to sepsis onset (54), which may be predictive of subsequent decreases in mature platelet counts once infection sets in Muronoi et al (55). In this regard %-IPF has been reported as highly sensitive in identifying patients with sepsis regardless of extent of infection or severity (56,57).…”
Section: Immature Platelets During Infectious Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IPF levels have been found significantly higher in patients with gestational hypertension compared to controls [ 7 ]. IPF has been reported to have a comparable efficiency to C-reactive protein (CRP) in discriminating patients who had sepsis and those who had not and to be predicting the risk of developing sepsis in patients admitted to intensive care unit [ 8 ]. IPF could be used as a screening tool for bacterial infection in hospitalised patients with neutrophilia with significant correlation to blood culture positivity [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%