2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative Imaging Techniques Used to Evaluate Borderline-Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang et al [88] showed that MRI and CT have similar performance in assessing PDAC tumor size before and after NAT. However, dynamic MRI is not commonly performed and should only be attempted by experienced centers due to difficulties in reproducibility and standardization [89]. Provided that resectable or borderline resectable tumors on post-NAT CT were considered eligible for resection, the sensitivity and specificity of the CT-determined resectability were 95.2% (95% CI, 89.1-98.4%) and 8.7% (95% CI, 1.1-28.0%), respectively [90].…”
Section: Resectability After Nat/nacrtmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yang et al [88] showed that MRI and CT have similar performance in assessing PDAC tumor size before and after NAT. However, dynamic MRI is not commonly performed and should only be attempted by experienced centers due to difficulties in reproducibility and standardization [89]. Provided that resectable or borderline resectable tumors on post-NAT CT were considered eligible for resection, the sensitivity and specificity of the CT-determined resectability were 95.2% (95% CI, 89.1-98.4%) and 8.7% (95% CI, 1.1-28.0%), respectively [90].…”
Section: Resectability After Nat/nacrtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second concerns the possibility that an imaging-clean adipose plane can be restored by NAT, providing an indication of a possible R0 resection that turns out to be incorrect due to the presence of a residual microscopic infiltration of the perivascular region. In the first hypothesis, the forecast of an R0 resectability would be erroneously reduced, and in the second, it would be erroneously increased [89]. The NCCN guidelines have introduced customized criteria for PDAC resection after NAT, where radiographic findings, unless demonstrating clear disease progression, are no longer the only criteria used to propose exploratory surgery in the presence of other patient data showing clinical improvement and at least stable or decreased CA 19-9 [59].…”
Section: Resectability After Nat/nacrtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, ICG loses fluorescence intensity after binding to proteins in blood vessels when visualized with NIR [78], therefore limiting use in highly vascular tissues, which is often the case in HPB surgery. Furthermore, the ICG signal may be hindered further by blood pooling within the surgical field secondary to blood loss, which is not uncommon in hepatobiliary surgery [79]. Of importance, hemoglobin is one of the few strong endogenous contrast agents that allow for the identification of microvascular changes and tissue oxygenation using MSOT [58,80], and it has been successfully used to monitor tumor responses to antiangiogenic agents in mouse models [81].…”
Section: Photodynamic Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%